Sarin V Erigaisi (East Indian game) (cultural perplexing) Sarin's game-

The prevalence; it seems of Sarin's opening prep- is that of something simple which is prevalent- to the outcomes; which are held accountable; in his prep- prep being rather simple- and not losing at hand; the perplexing argument; which is imposed; 

The liability of moves which are more induced- responsible; which are entailed- to predisposition; which is irrespective; to not give away any opening prep- by the - 

Kings opening Fienchetto opening- which the peculiar notion; which is irrespective; to the case which is imposed- East Indian- prezivikopa vary; of the variation; which is entailed; 

by move 8; the escalation of moves between Sarin and Erigaisi- escalates extremely quickly- which are imposed- by the normative; which is imposed- 

6... a5 (the flank consideration) is an idea instead of going for 

a) Minority development;  
b) control the e file (typical more of Northern European players
c) knf6 ( a passive developmental move) (which is typical of more Eastern European players-

7....c6 this minority move after a flank idea on solidification is extremely debatable by Erigaisi

8.Re1 ( ptincipled move on contention of centre)

Personally. I thought b3 had better consideration- on the values of compensation which is held;

because the East Indian game; typically from understanding- means that the "west side" of the board- has to be moved imperatively;  Meaning the case the '"west" side of the board on occupancy is an requirement to be forced to be pushed.

9. knb2 ;The simplication of the move; and for counter development at hand; is extremely iillicit in consideration; which I believe there were better responses by white on development.

12. knxe4 ( I thought was extremely question-  because rook e4 is more apparent;  where ( look at goldsmith variation study)

13.h6 - shows create understanding of minority defense (refined move)

14. bd5? ( I thought had creating a side fianchetto had more inclinations- than the disposed move- which I thought Bc4 had more proponent moves to not IMPLICIT cause a draw.

High level end game skills- which are prevalent on minorities which are held; to come to prevalent defences which I will analyse end game skills on a later date;

however I believe in this game; Sarin was the weaker player- because Sarin had more opportunities to explore- where Erigaisi FORCED the draw.