When you are using an engine, it's probably a bad idea to call attention to your games
A member who uses the screen name "neeraj_88" posted this a few days ago:
"Neeraj_8" account is closed. Staff member please can you tell me the reason. When i send a support ticket, it says that I will get respose in 24 hours but I never get response of any of the support tickets before 4 to 5 days.
Upon inspection, the neeraj_8 account was closed with a cheater badge: http://www.chess.com/home/game_archive?member=neeraj_8
I spot checked a few of neeraj_8's games over 20 moves - and guess what? Not a single inaccuracy, mistake, or blunder! And ridiculously low average centipawn losses.
You know, that sort of thing piques my interest. So I checked neeraj_88's games. I'll let the readers come to their own decision.
http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=116103342 neeraj_88: 1 inaccuracies, 0 mistakes, 0 blunders, 9 average centipawn loss wb313: 4 inaccuracies, 2 mistakes, 1 blunder, 71 average centipawn loss
http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=116125078 michaeldale: 2 inaccuracies, 1 mistakes, 1 blunder, 61 average centipawn loss neeraj_88: 0 inaccuracies, 0 mistakes, 0 blunders, 1 average centipawn loss
http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=116213694 stefvarna67: 1 inaccuracies, 2 mistakes, 2 blunders, 61 average centipwn loss neeraj_88: 0 inaccuracies, 0 mistakes, 0 blunders, 3 average centipawn loss
http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=116189110 neeraj_88: 0 inaccuracies, 0 mistakes, 0 blunders, 8 average centipawn loss michaeldale: 1 inaccuracies, 1 mistakes, 1 blunders, 67 average centipawn loss
http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=116216722 neeraj_88: 0 inaccuracies, 0 mistakes, 0 blunders, 6 average centipawn loss stefvarna67: 2 inaccuracies, 0 mistakes, 2 blunders, 50 average centipwn loss
http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=116179610 neeraj_88: 0 inaccuracies, 0 mistakes, 0 blunders, 10 average centipawn loss donbiggen: 3 inaccuracies, 6 mistakes, 0 blunders, 46 average centipwn loss
Now, this was not a random sample of neeraj_88's completed games. This was every (non-960) game he has finished since his neeraj_8 cheater account was closed.
It would be wrong of me to accuse him of continued engine use, in public. No naming and shaming, you know. I am just highlighting some astoundingly perfect play by a returned engine cheater.
What do you think?
UPDATE 1.0 The neeraj_88 account is closed and the new (11 August) neeraj_25 account has opened. http://www.chess.com/members/view/neeraj_25