Weak Squares and Outposts Part 5 - Considerations

Identification

We must identify the weaknesses in our opponent's position, as well as those that exist in our own position. Without proper identification, we will not have proper calculation. Utilizing weaknesses and converting potential outposts into actual outposts is critical.

Visualization

Visualization with imagination allowed White to identify a potential weakness and convert it into an actual weakness by sacrificing material. White then exploited the weakness to produce unstoppable initiative to win the game.

Activation

Next we visit Tilburg, NED, where in 1998 at the Fontys Tournament, Vladimir Kramnik was able to gain a slight advantage over Vadim Zvjaginsev, thanks to greater piece activity. Black's Queenside also became somewhat exposed on the dark squares.

Exploitation

Next we visit Gothenburg Sweden, where the Swedish Championship was held in July of 2006. In the 11th round, Rauan Sagit (AKA testviking at chess.com; who became an IM four years ago at the Rilton Cup)  faced GM Johan Hellsten against whom he was a 300 rating point underdog. Despite a one pawn deficit after 23 moves, Black had a comfortable game with well placed minors. Nonetheless, the Grandmaster took him to school.

Minimization 

It is not only critical to identify and utilize weak squares in your opponent's position, but it is also crucial to safeguard the weak squares and potential outposts in your own camp. In this game, we will see how GM Valerij Filippov compelled GM Xie Jun to fill a central hole in Black's camp with one of her pawns, rendering that weak square inaccessible to the White pieces.

Compensation

In chess, as in life, it is often necessary to make concessions in order to produce compensation. In the following game, Ivanisevic will yield a central outpost square to Solak, but will be rewarded with a half open file for his Rooks as well as activity for his dark squared Bishop.