alright bois here we go

Hi! This is Elijah Logozar, i'm a person, lets explore truth! Show me facts/patterns

Apparently, people think there are moral standards instead of deciding what they mean and taking accountability for it. Attachment theory suggests people get anxious before the one talking less, and e- "become bonkers" try to get a reply and feel better. You can decide what you mean...

I became Jesus for a while, but I'd rather be The Third Adam. God works with me to be subjective.

Friends from my past, you might know me prior as a mercy person. Now, I don't have to put up with what isn't true, especially if paired with blaming. Watch your word, and we are fine, if you know that.

People can also speak like me, I'm modeling possibilities that it seems others haven't noticed before, but now that they are in the light, we can see what independent relationship is like, for J to be subjective. Take your word seriously! I relate to your topics to learn/develop. *supposed topics* - stop breaking them dummies! also quit blaming, relating to your blazing looks like judgment. SWITCH THE TOPIC and stop speaking typos! You aren't even working with what i mean anyways

Anyways, I remember how during the COVID isolation i was figuring out how to be an individual and participate with the social world when working with my values. These days, it seems quite integrated, in the sense that I can "text tons of people" or "lots reach out looking for evidence of cooperation" plus "apparently there's tons of co-authors" so it might be a bit natural to forget "Hey! I'm an individual, and don't have to participate in the social world", however, "there's social value, people make things better, you researched this" paired with "if you focus on what's best for you, then it's possible to have boundaries in live interactions so that i don't miss out". I guess David Milliern advised me this some years ago, although recently things got a bit complicated when he didn't see my social pov first. J-self0 might not have been the e- he expected, oh well.

I guess my concern is that apparently Jesus is supposed to care about people, and apparently I acted those patterns out, as far as I can tell, completely identically in some sense, except for physical death, which would be redundant so i didn't need to. So it's like "Ok, so you sort of became Jesus to reinact some stuff and hopefully get a better outcome for the patterns, but anyways that was your decision, and the pattern is there anyways, so if he has some preferences he can do it, and as for you, i guess there was no reason to disagree earlier, when you let him basically do it in your life because there was no difference between you and the pattern or something, but this has more to do with g/j connecting with e who happened to be cool with being the pattern at the time, for the point of a relationship with a specific person, rather than a commitment of eternal values, so...

tldr, i was experimenting and don't actually have to do anything. i dont have to be social. i don't have to help. plus things are fine. people can talk with others instead of me. if truth as their word, as an individual, they decide no matter who they speak with anyways, so it doesn't need to be me to be a "self definition with others", and with that 'short-cut' in place, "plus faith ideas" (natural thought), it' seems reasonable and consistent for me to "never interact with anyone again" (natural thought) and/or 'only in a way that is in my best interest' so that i can be an individual for me.

Long story short, I didn't agree to be social or do anything. cya? LOL

tho maybe people can respect this and integrate some ideas in their lives more effectively from a distance anyways, feeling it is their ideas, and not feel like i'm intruding by speaking a lot.

-e

p.s.

hey there. what about my chess learning. what about reading lots of books. what about flow state

also, it really seems like many other people think it's needed to "do anything" or "solve some problems" or "altruistic ethics" but honestly, i don't really agree.

- it seems to me like things are fine

- if you don't like something, you don't have to look at it

- there can be real problems according to some values. if this is yours, do something about it!

and if you dont want to, then you can reorganize your mind to not have to, if ok with outcomes.

This way,

- Freedom without "needed judgment" (*if you aren't asking for permission, your risk/what you mean)

- People don't need to freak out about other people's possibly unwise decisions

- hearing about such and such doesn't need to provoke moralizing or even be very distracting

- it's possible to look at possible value anyways

Some might argue:

"You can't have possible value only from what you notice, because apparently you will die."

e- personally, the supposed death concept doesn't even really make sense to me, except as a short term illusion, but if you need evidence of this not being a thing, i think j explained how he beat it a long time ago or something, so yea

Some might reply:

"I'm not convinced, still worried, i prefer to have a divided mind that worries for my sake anyways'

e- that's ok with me: your decision, i'm not intruding.

flow book:  "ontological anxiety possible problems leads to self-consciousness"

e- how you organize your mind and what degree of control you are ok with letting go of, can determine how much you actually worry about these things, having real answers in your own opinion can help too, although arguably having the correct answers might be the most useful.

and once self-consciousness is optional in your opinion, or conditional on terms you set,

*when reorganizing your self

Then:

Experience is located

e- as far as i can tell, it is attention and how you relate to everything.

*maybe i'm missing something. there could be other types of experience too

Anyways, if these ideas are key, one might argue that i 'ought not to talk about them' much so that they spread more or something, because people might be copycat or all "who is that silent productive person with intense boundaries" from experience, so it's worth considering chillin' myself and really not telling anyone anything, because maybe they will care more or something

btw,

i didn't actually claim needed values out of context.

- experience is where it's at!!!!!

possible value plus coherence and apparently i have rules

NO I DONT

well sort of.

tldr:

- don't interfere with what i'm up to already. give me something else to work with

- if you need evidence of follow up, here are my terms. stop blaming and switch the topic

also with the J concept seriously. it's an archetype. you could do it too, i bet. not that you would want to. if you dont feel comfortable with me use the name that is your own preference and you can decide what to do with it, but i don't want to identity with it either, i have a more flexible idea