Exchange Sac

Avatar of Loomis
| 4

Pretty much all chess players learn early on that rooks are more valuable than minor pieces (knights and bishops). Winning a rook for a minor piece is called winning "the exchange". We learn how to use our knights to fork and we grow to believe that winning a game up an exchange is the proper order of things in the chess universe.

 

At some point we learn that strong players will sometimes sacrifice a rook for a minor piece - sacrificng the exchange. Sometimes there are immediate consequences and the exchange sac is not so difficult to understand, but often the sac is for a long term positional advantage that is much more mysterious.

 

While I don't fully comprehend the exchange sac, I was lucky enough to get to play one successfully in a game here on chess.com. Though there are mistakes in the early part of the game, it is largely left unannotated until we get to the sacrifice. 


 

Here is the mate in 5 puzzle:

 


Welcome to my blog! In the USCF I am rated 1921.

 

The content posted here is from my real chess experience, either games I've played or observed. I'll try to put an instructive twist on it. So if you're looking for a glimpse into how a B player thinks about the game, check in and see what I've got. Well, recently my rating has gone over 1800, so perhaps I should list myself as class A instead of class B, but it's not a huge difference.

Loomis
United States us.gif

View complete profile