Positional Understanding and controlling maximum squares

Playing with white sometimes gives you an additional advantage to dominate the most squares possible and is better for attacking initially whereas, black is known for defense but, Note:- does not always work against high rated player (>2000) .

On Sunday, i was chilling with my friends and all of a sudden i tried to flex in front of my peoples and result came out more astonishing for me as well as for them. I was paired to play against black pieces, so i have to play 1st move as usual, e4 d5 the famous Scandinavian Defense , pawn takes pawn, queen takes pawn, Nc3 of course i have made a blog on early premove againts 14 hundred where my opponent played a5 as main line and i played b4 then took queen after his premove of pawn on e5 .

but this time the situation was not the same as my opponent was maybe a fan of my blogs and had read some of my contents so he retreated back on its original square to d8 game continuous as......

Notice, on move no. 10 white was having the space as well as positional advantage which was i of course and was eager to witness just a Blunder move of my opponent to get the Eval bar    (which is really evil to me) support my . because his 1 Blunder move enhances the chances to win for me.

The activity of my pieces was smashing and every pieces are responsible to control some areas which my opponents pieces can not, thus his pieces are slightly on a passive side of the board, later some maneuvering of pieces and i becoming more and more greedy and was looking forward to attack their queen with bishop but forget that they can defend their queen by a single move advancement which would result in retreating my bishop back ,but where back was the question.
 
There was not the time pressure but heaps of distractions but i would not be blaming others and played Bc1 to its original square , in chess under developing pieces to their original squares is not recommendable still i played ugh whyyy idk and the my eval bar (  very evil ) abandoned supporting me. my opponent sensed it and then he played the same IQ move as i played earlier

I relaxed and tranquilized myself. on and on i started to dominate and find weaknesses , which i found of course.

shuffle and shuffle and then a Blunder of my opponent, Rad8
i can take a free pawn as well as a rook for a knight, by just 1 blunder move, i.e Rad8.

my opponent tried to act smart as out of nowhere played Kxd4 so i captured it with f knight , Nfxd4 Bxd4, cxd4 Ng6 and finally Nxf8 Rxf8

Now, i was a full Rook up but unconnected, so my goal was to connect the towers and play for a win .

i go for a check which was defended by their rook and then connecting towers by Be3. then again some arrangements of pieces to their better squares occurred and we came to this position,

Should i take pawn on b5 or should i defend my pawn on d4 was a question, i started to calculate if i take pawn then, Kxd4 Qxd7 Rxd7 Bxd4 and Rxd4 and takes pawn on b7

 

or second option was to defend my pawn which can maybe promote to a queen or could get exchanged by the cost of Knight ,

if knight takes bishop then i have calculated mate in <30 moves. but wanted to play more aggressive and fast thus, played queen takes pawn and after a couple of exchanges which i have mentioned in option 1 happened exactly

 After i played h3 giving a breathing space to king also avoiding some back rank issues, Opponent resigned as their was noting to defend of. and i won and flexed louder in from my friends with 86% accuracy and performance rating of 2100.