Up Up Away, Chess We Play
@Renate-Irene

Up Up Away, Chess We Play

Avatar of Renate-Irene
| 13

This poem was written in response to a question asked in my chess club. "Why do chess players with such a high IQ play chess when there are so many other things they could do."

Chess Players

There was no place for me in a world of grey

They told me that black and white was not the way

Truth laced with lies

one must compromise

one cannot live by truth alone

To strive, one must truth disown

tomorrow black might be white

and that's ok

things change, you say

 

You wonder why

chess players with such a high IQ

chose to push wooden pieces

when

there is so much work to do

Problems are everywhere

their IQ would be of good use there

 

why can't they do something more constructively

then pushing wooden pieces

though a boarded sea

when there are important things to do

Can't they see,

their ability

comes with social responsibility?

 

Your judgment is true for what you see

but that is not their reality

in chess, the rationale for each move is clear

it's not constrained by emotional gear

insisting that this the truth must be

for this is how we are used to see

You do not want to hear what you do not already know

So, where should new ideas go?

 

In chess, new ideas are able to test their validity

 to present their arguments bias-free

each idea has a chance to fail or prevail

based on its merit,

not some criteria of their being the same

this is the power of the game

 

Chess is filled with principles indeed

but contextualized application is the need

chess honors generality

but in specifics, its glory you see

a chess player knows the long-term when and how

as well as the specific now

to synthesize tactics and strategy

requires novelty

 

In chess, to do what has always been done

will get a draw indeed

but for victory is the need.

 

chess draws artists

scientists and all the professions

you can name

we come together

different yet the same

to enjoy the game

@Renate-Irene

I have decided to start a series of blogs in the new year. As I thought about it, many ideas presented themselves. I may pursue them later, but as it is Christmas time, I thought I would start with a series of blogs honoring three people who have deeply and profoundly affected my attitude toward chess and life. The first blog, today’s blog, will set the background. 

Toward the end of his life, William  Lombardy visited the Mechanics Institute in San Francisco, California. I remember when he came in and sat next to me on the first day of the Imre Koenig event. This was a special two-day round-robin event where invited grandmasters competed against each other. If I remember correctly, there were only four players, Daniel Naroditsky and Sam Shankland among them.

I did not recognize the stranger who sat next to me, but John Donaldson, the MI chess director, did. He greeted him and brought out an old picture of a chess event with Lombardy sitting in the front row. Handing the picture to Lombardy, he asked Lombardy if he remembered. Lombardy smiled. Then John invited him to join us the following day for a special grandmaster luncheon.

After the luncheon, while I was cleaning up, Lombardy and I talked. I asked him what I could do to improve in chess. I told him I studied games by analyzing them, but It was a very slow and time-consuming process. He suggested that I spend 10 minutes a day going quickly through as many games as possible. “That won’t work,” I responded. So he tried a different track; he asked me if I stopped it every few minutes to analyze it when I listened to music. Hmm, he had a point; I do not stop the music every few minutes while listening. Lombardy and I spent an hour or two that afternoon discussing many things. We had a wonderful time.

After that event, Lombardy often visited the MI, especially on Tuesday nights when the place was buzzing with people. Tuesday is the night of the historic Tuesday Night Marathon, which often draws more than 100 players.

As participants finish, they gather in the skittles room, a special room with walls covered with pictures of famous chess players. A tall picture of Tal smoking his cigar is on one side, a photograph of Spassky giving a simultaneous exhibition at the Mechanics Institute on the other side. Over the door to the office is a framed picture of Bobby Fischer on the cover of Time magazine. Additional pictures are scattered over the walls, such as Frank Sinatra and Walter Browne playing chess, giving the room the comfortable feeling of a home rather than a club. The room is filled with solid wooden chess tables, each with its history.

On Tuesday nights, the room is full as the players of the Tuesday night marathon stream in. “What would you have done if I played this?’’ “Why did you play this move?” “What were you thinking here?” “You nearly got me there.”  “Why didn’t you play this move?”

These questions, asked quietly at various tables as players analyze their games at each table, give the room a quiet buzz of fellowship and camaraderie. Lombardy and I were sitting at one of the tables across from each other. He had been talking to one of his friends, who just had left. So I set down across from him, handing him a poem I wrote about Bobby Fischer. I always wondered if my portrayal of Bobby Fischer was accurate, and here I had someone who knew him well. I was not going to let this opportunity slip by.

At first, he was reluctant to read it, but he agreed. As he started reading the poem, I heard him comment, “I like this….” “The wording here needs to be changed…” etc. When he had finished, I looked eagerly at him. “Did I capture Bobby Fischer?” He nodded; there was a pause, and then I heard him quietly say, “It could have been me.”