Dynamic Equality
@renate-Irene

Dynamic Equality

Avatar of Renate-Irene
| 4

Dynamic Equality

What makes chess such a powerful, exciting game? One critical factor is the dynamic equality of the pieces. 

"What is dynamic equality?"  It means that one side has a static advantage and the other side has a dynamic advantage, and both cancel out, leaving equality."

Whereas the above quote examines dynamic quality in the game, in this blog, I want to examine the concept in terms of the assigned piece value—the same idea at a different level of analysis.

What creates dynamic equality or dynamic inequality in chess? I think there are at least three primary elements: the different functions of the pieces, the pieces' strengths and weaknesses, and the pieces' placement relative to the critical position on the board. This blog focuses on one aspect: the strengths and weaknesses of the pieces. In this blog, I want to explore a different viewpoint.

I want to look at it from the viewpoint of the pieces, who cannot see the big picture. They are like us, going about their business, trying to make the best of their strengths and deal with their weaknesses. Most likely, throwing a wistful glance at others, they lament the perceived inequality, not seeing the symphony of the game but only their own "small" part.

I tried to capture this in the poem below:

Inequality

In chess, there is inequality – a bishop or a queen can never be,

He is assigned to his slot –

The Light Square or Dark

He changes not

 

Yet as a pair, his strength can greater be

For he covers all the diagonals, you see

And while a queen, he can never attack

He can take her with the help of a skewer check

Overcoming inequality

Greater than the queen, he can be

 

The queen, though strong, has a difficult lot

She must fight alone and must run a lot

Her companions can defend her only to a degree

 Because everyone likes to take a powerful piece, you see

To whom can she turn for comfort and understanding?

The king whose life is her concern?

His danger signals her lot.

She sacrifices on the spot.

 

The king in majesty rules in his lair

The concern for his safety is beyond compare

Each piece is concerned with keeping him safe

Often smothering his life into the grave

Only allowed one square to go

His life is lonely in a way that only a ruler can know.

 

The knight, oh, how unpredictable is he

He jumps from place to place so carelessly

So free

Creating forks here and there

Threatening everyone everywhere

Closed or open position

He does not care

No limitations he can see

Yet unstable is he

With each move, he must let go of the territory he possessed

He can be driven to and fro

And a rock or bishop can jail him

With no place to go

 

The rock, the opposite is he

Sturdy and as predictable as predictable can be

In straight lines, he moves across the plain

Straight forward, always the same

From side to side, he may sway

But always in straight lines, he must stay

He destroys everything in his bullying way

Yet when blocked, he weeps in dismay

 

The pawn, oh, how difficult is its lot

He only gets to move one spot

He may start with two

But careful he must be

en passant

Ends hope for the future he can see.

Dreary is his life

Step by step, fighting to survive

But if, to the end, he makes his way

He can see

His is a promotion beyond compare

If only he could get there

He is the only piece that can transform

A tedious living

For a glorious morn

When he is reborn

 

Each piece has a unique position in the game

Their jobs are not the same

They differ in their personality

Some may call this inequality

Yet the differences make chess

The beautiful that it can be

Sameness would deny

The richness

That life can occupy

@Renate-Irene

 

I have decided to start a series of blogs in the new year. As I thought about it, many ideas presented themselves. I may pursue them later, but as it is Christmas time, I thought I would start with a series of blogs honoring three people who have deeply and profoundly affected my attitude toward chess and life. The first blog, today’s blog, will set the background. 

Toward the end of his life, William  Lombardy visited the Mechanics Institute in San Francisco, California. I remember when he came in and sat next to me on the first day of the Imre Koenig event. This was a special two-day round-robin event where invited grandmasters competed against each other. If I remember correctly, there were only four players, Daniel Naroditsky and Sam Shankland among them.

I did not recognize the stranger who sat next to me, but John Donaldson, the MI chess director, did. He greeted him and brought out an old picture of a chess event with Lombardy sitting in the front row. Handing the picture to Lombardy, he asked Lombardy if he remembered. Lombardy smiled. Then John invited him to join us the following day for a special grandmaster luncheon.

After the luncheon, while I was cleaning up, Lombardy and I talked. I asked him what I could do to improve in chess. I told him I studied games by analyzing them, but It was a very slow and time-consuming process. He suggested that I spend 10 minutes a day going quickly through as many games as possible. “That won’t work,” I responded. So he tried a different track; he asked me if I stopped it every few minutes to analyze it when I listened to music. Hmm, he had a point; I do not stop the music every few minutes while listening. Lombardy and I spent an hour or two that afternoon discussing many things. We had a wonderful time.

After that event, Lombardy often visited the MI, especially on Tuesday nights when the place was buzzing with people. Tuesday is the night of the historic Tuesday Night Marathon, which often draws more than 100 players.

As participants finish, they gather in the skittles room, a special room with walls covered with pictures of famous chess players. A tall picture of Tal smoking his cigar is on one side, a photograph of Spassky giving a simultaneous exhibition at the Mechanics Institute on the other side. Over the door to the office is a framed picture of Bobby Fischer on the cover of Time magazine. Additional pictures are scattered over the walls, such as Frank Sinatra and Walter Browne playing chess, giving the room the comfortable feeling of a home rather than a club. The room is filled with solid wooden chess tables, each with its history.

On Tuesday nights, the room is full as the players of the Tuesday night marathon stream in. “What would you have done if I played this?’’ “Why did you play this move?” “What were you thinking here?” “You nearly got me there.”  “Why didn’t you play this move?”

These questions, asked quietly at various tables as players analyze their games at each table, give the room a quiet buzz of fellowship and camaraderie. Lombardy and I were sitting at one of the tables across from each other. He had been talking to one of his friends, who just had left. So I set down across from him, handing him a poem I wrote about Bobby Fischer. I always wondered if my portrayal of Bobby Fischer was accurate, and here I had someone who knew him well. I was not going to let this opportunity slip by.

At first, he was reluctant to read it, but he agreed. As he started reading the poem, I heard him comment, “I like this….” “The wording here needs to be changed…” etc. When he had finished, I looked eagerly at him. “Did I capture Bobby Fischer?” He nodded; there was a pause, and then I heard him quietly say, “It could have been me.”