Gifts of Kindness Conclusion (part 3): An Unknown Chess Player
@Renate-Irene

Gifts of Kindness Conclusion (part 3): An Unknown Chess Player

Avatar of Renate-Irene
| 10

Gifts of Kindness Conclusion (part 3): An Unknown Chess Player

This is the last blog in this series, dedicated to an unknown player. I do not know this person's name, as I met him only once, yet the memory lingers. I met him early in my chess career, it must have been in my second or third tournament game at the Mechanics Institute. After I had lost the game, my opponent asked me kindly, "You have never encountered the French before?" "No," I responded. "Let me show you," he said, as we walked toward the skittles room. We found a table, and he began explaining the French defense to me. I watched, awed. His face was aglow with love and passion, and when he finished, he looked at me with a radiant face, "Isn't it beautiful?"

At the time, I did not understand the intricacies of the French, nor did I see the harmony of the pieces, or the potential for development. What I did understand, however, was the vision of beauty that my opponent saw, and I wanted to discover it.

Part of the Christmas story includes the three wise men who brought gifts to the Christ child. Sometimes in our lives, we, too, are blessed with wise men who bring us gifts.

In conclusion to this series of blogs, I want to thank my three wise men for their gifts -- Lombardy, for the gift of hope and perseverance; John Donaldson, for the gift of acceptance, without which growth is impossible; and the unknown player, for showing me the beauty of a game I have grown to love.

I wish everyone a Merry Christmas, and may you, too, be blessed with gifts from wise men.

 

Song for Epiphany: "I have seen the light."

@Renate-Irene

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-x5Ff3EHHz4

I have decided to start a series of blogs in the new year. As I thought about it, many ideas presented themselves. I may pursue them later, but as it is Christmas time, I thought I would start with a series of blogs honoring three people who have deeply and profoundly affected my attitude toward chess and life. The first blog, today’s blog, will set the background. 

Toward the end of his life, William  Lombardy visited the Mechanics Institute in San Francisco, California. I remember when he came in and sat next to me on the first day of the Imre Koenig event. This was a special two-day round-robin event where invited grandmasters competed against each other. If I remember correctly, there were only four players, Daniel Naroditsky and Sam Shankland among them.

I did not recognize the stranger who sat next to me, but John Donaldson, the MI chess director, did. He greeted him and brought out an old picture of a chess event with Lombardy sitting in the front row. Handing the picture to Lombardy, he asked Lombardy if he remembered. Lombardy smiled. Then John invited him to join us the following day for a special grandmaster luncheon.

After the luncheon, while I was cleaning up, Lombardy and I talked. I asked him what I could do to improve in chess. I told him I studied games by analyzing them, but It was a very slow and time-consuming process. He suggested that I spend 10 minutes a day going quickly through as many games as possible. “That won’t work,” I responded. So he tried a different track; he asked me if I stopped it every few minutes to analyze it when I listened to music. Hmm, he had a point; I do not stop the music every few minutes while listening. Lombardy and I spent an hour or two that afternoon discussing many things. We had a wonderful time.

After that event, Lombardy often visited the MI, especially on Tuesday nights when the place was buzzing with people. Tuesday is the night of the historic Tuesday Night Marathon, which often draws more than 100 players.

As participants finish, they gather in the skittles room, a special room with walls covered with pictures of famous chess players. A tall picture of Tal smoking his cigar is on one side, a photograph of Spassky giving a simultaneous exhibition at the Mechanics Institute on the other side. Over the door to the office is a framed picture of Bobby Fischer on the cover of Time magazine. Additional pictures are scattered over the walls, such as Frank Sinatra and Walter Browne playing chess, giving the room the comfortable feeling of a home rather than a club. The room is filled with solid wooden chess tables, each with its history.

On Tuesday nights, the room is full as the players of the Tuesday night marathon stream in. “What would you have done if I played this?’’ “Why did you play this move?” “What were you thinking here?” “You nearly got me there.”  “Why didn’t you play this move?”

These questions, asked quietly at various tables as players analyze their games at each table, give the room a quiet buzz of fellowship and camaraderie. Lombardy and I were sitting at one of the tables across from each other. He had been talking to one of his friends, who just had left. So I set down across from him, handing him a poem I wrote about Bobby Fischer. I always wondered if my portrayal of Bobby Fischer was accurate, and here I had someone who knew him well. I was not going to let this opportunity slip by.

At first, he was reluctant to read it, but he agreed. As he started reading the poem, I heard him comment, “I like this….” “The wording here needs to be changed…” etc. When he had finished, I looked eagerly at him. “Did I capture Bobby Fischer?” He nodded; there was a pause, and then I heard him quietly say, “It could have been me.”