The Pawns’ Secret Life
All images created with Firefly and Photoshop, © Renate Otterbach

The Pawns’ Secret Life

Avatar of Renate-Irene
| 16

Introduction

The pawn is the most fascinating piece on the chessboard. It has the lowest value yet the greatest potential. It is the only piece that can change. 

Before Philidor's focus on the power of the pawn, chess was focused on gambits and quick matting attacks. Philidor elevated the importance of the pawn. His famous quote, "The pawn is the soul of chess," is often quoted; however, the complete quote in context is:  

"To play the pawns well; they are the soul of chess: it is they which uniquely determine the attack and the defense, and their good or bad arrangement depends entirely on the winning or losing of the game." 

Philidor's insight fundamentally changed the game. Now, there are whole books on pawn structure, and for most endgame books king and pawn endgames are required reading. They are the stars of the endgame, and the rest of the pieces are supporting casts.

Aron Nimzowitsch went even further: he stated,

"A passed pawn is a criminal which should be kept under lock and key."

I agree wholeheartedly with Nimzowitch if you are speaking about my opponent's passed pawn. But when it comes to my passed pawn, I disagree. I love my passed pawn. Rather than locking him up, I want to support him so he can fulfill his full potential. 

Yet Philidor, Nimzowitsch, and I are all outside observers; what is life like from a pawn's point of view? I tried to explore this idea through a poem.





Your heart may envy those with more might

Forgetting what should be its secret delight

You can transform into whatever piece you want to be

At the end of the board, there is a new life for thee.

I have decided to start a series of blogs in the new year. As I thought about it, many ideas presented themselves. I may pursue them later, but as it is Christmas time, I thought I would start with a series of blogs honoring three people who have deeply and profoundly affected my attitude toward chess and life. The first blog, today’s blog, will set the background. 

Toward the end of his life, William  Lombardy visited the Mechanics Institute in San Francisco, California. I remember when he came in and sat next to me on the first day of the Imre Koenig event. This was a special two-day round-robin event where invited grandmasters competed against each other. If I remember correctly, there were only four players, Daniel Naroditsky and Sam Shankland among them.

I did not recognize the stranger who sat next to me, but John Donaldson, the MI chess director, did. He greeted him and brought out an old picture of a chess event with Lombardy sitting in the front row. Handing the picture to Lombardy, he asked Lombardy if he remembered. Lombardy smiled. Then John invited him to join us the following day for a special grandmaster luncheon.

After the luncheon, while I was cleaning up, Lombardy and I talked. I asked him what I could do to improve in chess. I told him I studied games by analyzing them, but It was a very slow and time-consuming process. He suggested that I spend 10 minutes a day going quickly through as many games as possible. “That won’t work,” I responded. So he tried a different track; he asked me if I stopped it every few minutes to analyze it when I listened to music. Hmm, he had a point; I do not stop the music every few minutes while listening. Lombardy and I spent an hour or two that afternoon discussing many things. We had a wonderful time.

After that event, Lombardy often visited the MI, especially on Tuesday nights when the place was buzzing with people. Tuesday is the night of the historic Tuesday Night Marathon, which often draws more than 100 players.

As participants finish, they gather in the skittles room, a special room with walls covered with pictures of famous chess players. A tall picture of Tal smoking his cigar is on one side, a photograph of Spassky giving a simultaneous exhibition at the Mechanics Institute on the other side. Over the door to the office is a framed picture of Bobby Fischer on the cover of Time magazine. Additional pictures are scattered over the walls, such as Frank Sinatra and Walter Browne playing chess, giving the room the comfortable feeling of a home rather than a club. The room is filled with solid wooden chess tables, each with its history.

On Tuesday nights, the room is full as the players of the Tuesday night marathon stream in. “What would you have done if I played this?’’ “Why did you play this move?” “What were you thinking here?” “You nearly got me there.”  “Why didn’t you play this move?”

These questions, asked quietly at various tables as players analyze their games at each table, give the room a quiet buzz of fellowship and camaraderie. Lombardy and I were sitting at one of the tables across from each other. He had been talking to one of his friends, who just had left. So I set down across from him, handing him a poem I wrote about Bobby Fischer. I always wondered if my portrayal of Bobby Fischer was accurate, and here I had someone who knew him well. I was not going to let this opportunity slip by.

At first, he was reluctant to read it, but he agreed. As he started reading the poem, I heard him comment, “I like this….” “The wording here needs to be changed…” etc. When he had finished, I looked eagerly at him. “Did I capture Bobby Fischer?” He nodded; there was a pause, and then I heard him quietly say, “It could have been me.”