Chess Rating vs Life Rating

'shut up, Donnie.'

I've had a chance to think.

...usually that's not a particularly good thing.  I think about things like 'candidate moves' and then think 'where can I get better candidates?" for said move.  

It's a mystery.

So I then thought:  There's a lot of stock placed in Chess ratings.  I mean, sure, it's Chess.com, but a lot of people seem to have a lot of self-identify invested in their rating.

Which is fine.

for them.

My rating somewhat sucks, so - in an attempt to salvage some self-worth, I propose that there be a Life Rating, which is the product of your chess rating and your bowling average.

See where I'm going with this?

There should probably be a third variable introduced to better a better constellation of information, I'm just not sure what that should be:  Golf handicap?  Darts 'average per throw', Bridge rating, Scrabble average per two player game?  

T'is a mystery.

for now.