Feminism is Eurocentrical propaganda.

Feminism is Eurocentrical propaganda.

The first of all this unequality hasn't been in any times. If we would longer analis the history , we would see , that there weren't that period. But to that , we will go later. More of this lecture will be historicals considerations.

The idea of equality of genders comes from the country of center. It has been created by lii zhIi in period of MiIng dynasty. So therefore it (that idea) should be called 女主義 or 李贄主義.

So why it's others? The earliest ruler , by whitch I guaide myself is that this do , who have got profit by it , so who has got profit, by it? What's the sense in playing down the culture and the heritage of China under pretext of creation that , what has been created?

With out doubghts , we can see , that reason of this name (as symbol , becouse I t i s i t .) , insulting China, was connecting that idea , with Roman Empire. Becouse , let we think , about ethymology , of this word it's definitely from latin word 'femina'.

So where it's going to? The reason of it is primitive. If we would go in future on this way as strongly and durably ,as we go now , in about 150 years it'll be a big murder of the chinese.

Let we look , how that idea show us image of China. With out analysing a few of facts , the China become in it the country of: sexual molestation, confucianism ( The Confucius has promoted [although do not created the idea of subjection woman , under man]) , debauchery ( in MiIng dynasty in villages homosexual mans were better teated , than heterosexuals) , patriarchate, with out any alternative , of confucianism. So only one thing , where they're going is a big murder of chinese people.

The next thing 's that human has been created without gender differences. I have also listen the hypothesis that source has tell , that it is from Friderick Engels , but I doubgh in that source's reliability , that the gold age of world in Grece mitology was the time when humans had matriarchat. 

*Important thing for us is , that the value of idea doesn't be influenced , by status of it's thinker, so we don't need , to think about that detail, and I think , that it is worthy , to cearfully think about it.

And here we need to talk about detail of it , whitch is inportant to understand the next part of that lecture. 

So we must to for a moment go back , to sociology, becouse we talk about societies. So the smalest part of society is family. Family is two seksual partners , whicht reproduce themselfs in order , to survive of specie and their offspring. We (unlooking on barbarians tribes' systems) can see three main models of it:

Matriarchat

In matriarchat mother had to prepear son to function in society , teach using weapon so she had to can it before , what make impossible creating gender differences. It had changed to patriarchat , becouse of economical reasons. Matriarchat require to existing having knowlagde by every members of society. Patriarchat need less of souces , as knowlagde. So every societies in that moment in history had choice , they can choose moral turpitude ,as European , in China and other many countries, or choose killing other tribes and abandon settling variant of live , as Mongolia or stop growing ,as in part off Africa.

Patriarchat

Going in the last hypothesis, the patriarchat was in silver age. If you want to know more about it , analise relations with Dzeus and Hera and beetween Kronos and Rea . That is one of thing , why I analise something, which's author is anonymous. Characteristic , for this system, is that there is a age of adultity. In patrarchat father teached son, after that moment. It is only one system , in what gender differences can arise. The condition of society only reflect the condition of the education.

The system of Mongolian tribes

And this system of family , we must analys saparately. Bug is thinking , that system is that , which , of parents teached son. System is a variant , of humans thinking. If you don't understand ,to teaching human must be prepared , by the live and society , by preparing defined charakteristerics confirm themselfs. In Mongolian tribes' system father has teached son , before third year , of his live. That is time , when human is starting controling his sigestive system. In Mongolian system charakteristical is that lacks in army were complemented , by womens. By this genger differences were smaller , than i European countries. I haven't here checked source , of this information enought good , but this to all of point of this text is not necessary , and that information match to psychology of that tribes. And out of it value of example , wchich is not necessary is the same , as imagined what is not necessary. Unnecessary examples must only be a example for possible bahave for people , to give them hope , that project maked , by Country is possible. But in time it must be before Yuán dynasty.

Cheapter 2 

So let we go to the part of historical considerations. An example of that, the unequality haven't been existing can be ancient Egypt. It is no point in looking for unequality in times before , becouse human wad created in matriarchat , and by evolution the society , can only detalise, that is detalise and share roles in society. It as only it , can't be enought proof ,but it is knowed ,that thare were many presented in art of that's culture womens , in that time humans wouldn't present abstrackt situations . Egypt was in that time patrialchal , but we can see ( It's clear , that we won't in any civilization find proof ,that's text that it is not patrialchal, becouse in that place it is normal, that it is not .) the examples in it of situations in culture heritage of Egypt. Alone that as we can see in many pictures womens can play senet in Egypt is one of proof to unexisting unequality in this country. The game of senet, what was probably hazard game , but supported by theres religion , so skills in it were respected. That proof means , that the Ancient Egypt as other African cultures has kept the part of matrialchal system. Here I want to quote to proof three right od my words the Jewish Babilonian Talmud.

In Kethuboth 61b, 8, translated under Epstein editorship [Soncino edition], one can read: "The practical difference between them [is the case of a woman] who plays with little cubs or [is addicted to] checkers.", explaining in the notes 'A woman who spends her time in this manner may be exposed to the temptation of unchastity but is in no danger of falling into idiocy'.

The next thing , what we need to analis ( I could not recognize here the example of Sparta, becouse it was patrialchal society , and the only one thing , what we can learn from it, is that the partriarchat is not coherence with debauchery and unrespect.) is the class bushi in Japan. In it we can see that in it womens as onna bugeisha can belong to army , what make the feminist version of history uncompatible with true. We have got substitute of it in japanese shinobi no mono too , but we haven't got to much informations about it. This practice have been practiced to Edo period. 

So let we go to part of this consideration about MiIng dynasty. Also in it we (and becouse of that the begining was [that , what it was]) see the begining of that ideas. Lii Zhi (1527 - 1602)was propaging this ideas , when it was informaly introduced by country. - About 1002 n.e. the Country of Center has let to womans education on mans' level. Coutesans were educated on their lovers' level. And becouse of that can be for a part of people controvensial ,here are books , on what my sources invoke: 

Patricia Buckley Ebrey, Anne Walthall, James B. Palais: East Asia: A Cultural, Social, and Political History. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2006. ISBN 0-618-13384-4.

Patricia Buckley Ebrey: The Cambridge Illustrated History of China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. ISBN 0-521-66991-X.

Timothy Brook: The Confusions of Pleasure: Commerce and Culture in Ming China. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998. ISBN 0-520-22154-0.

Other thing is that there are a premises ,about existing of elements of matriarchat in the tribes on north of China in that time. They base on the views of graves of womans , who had political mariage. The MiIng dynasty was existing to 1644.

The individual examples are important too , becouse they show us maximal abilities of entities. Even if we look at Isabella 1 of Castile or Catherine the Great. Also we have in Mesoamerica character as them the wak anil ajaw. We can see , that she's presented as man in that times , what show her place in that's hierarchy and show her abilities as ruler (ajaw) to do everything. Some people treat that picture as propaganda of power of ruler, but we must agree , about abilities, even needed , to propaganda. We can also find other cases as it in the mayan culture. There are some things(not in mayan culture) ,what suggest , that in Moche culture there were matriarchat , or at least elements of it , but we haven't got many informations , but it is more clear , that in Quechua culture womens had easy way to be medician.

The next thing , to analys is the Mongolia before the Yuán dynasty. I have told about it earlier. We haven't got too much informations about it, but it is consistent with knowlagde about that tribes and psychology of theres people s. In Mongolian culture care of mother to a child was unneeded , becouse age of adultity was in 3 years of its live what maked easier incorpirate womans to army.

And after it there is not anything to analys , becouse feminism has begonnen in XVII century in the French Revolution and the Edo period has ended in 1868. We know that in the Paris Comune Feminism was by the Country promoted after it there's present times. 

Cheapter 3

The main cause to creation this the last cheapter is necessarity of discussion main mistakes in other present analisys of this topic. Let we focus now on gender differences. In general of researches did by Sigmumd Freud ( He did one mistake in it , however I regard their right.) results that human's childhood has got the biggest influence on human's live. The project itself of introdution womans' laws in Europe was badly executed a result of it , it doesn't work , for the same reason ,as the democracy doesn't work. We 'll go back to it.

Existing of gender differences is characteristical for patrialchal system. It manifests itself ,not in consequences of it in behavior , but by difficoulties with holistic thinking in majority of womans. It does n't occur in other systems. A patrialchal education ( don't confuse with other meaning of this word , becouse I saw , that translations this topic to english and from are bad) is propaganda education, wchich doesn't require from womans thinking as result of wchich skill of combining facts fades away in majority of womans. Theoretically ,if mans were teached in this way , 80% of mans would be femboys. The difference comes from , that human receives large amount material stimuli and in some small level , he models himself on matter and matter on himself. Therefore [becouse mans have got bigger musculature] the percent of mans subjected to that process would be smaller. It is worth noting here ,that our society ( here Europe , America , China) is patrialchal society. But it doesn't bother feminists. 

The next thing, what we should consider is that , mistake is understand feminism , (as this movement , wchich it is) as the fight of womans for laws. If it were the case , they would make that. Only thing , what is needed , to reaction ( when doctrines in this case new , were accepted in law) were ultimately destroyed is to stop spread ideas , becouse reactions fry comes from reaction of spreading them . But they despite this still spread them. And even they sympathize with the reaction. In patrialchal education woman is prepeared to role of tool, so the only reason of feminist is by artificial make less availability, increase market value. Don't forget here , that feminists are people subjected to patriarchat.

The idea itself of introdution equality to Europe characterise lack of prepearing society to it. There are a few of way , to prepeare society to it. (The being of it is not in a piece of paper , but in society. The law is the agreement and humans must be psychologly prepeared for it.)

First 

You can consider, becouse human in big level model himself on others, to move place of residence of families , to unadapted families have contact only with adapted to reforms. The most important is make the process in youth. That is by country's camps especially this process should at girls (it is necessary to do that after voting age). Rooms and other things should by arranged to this people with undesirable features had only connection with only with this people , whose features are desirable that is this who are prepeared to reforms. But it require strict control from country. My ideas were ordered from the most radical, to the less.

Second

The next idea , wchich I had is a dividing society into three class. In first of them would be the most adapted people. In rights they would not very difference to socond. That person genneraly would fulfill the country's functions. Here it does n't go about country's hierarchy , it dependents who do that , as in every thing, person can do something good , or bad. Only one of offspring can don't have any important for courntry functions, otherwise family would fall down , to second class. It goes ,in this part, more about improvement of recrutation civil servant. In second would be persons from normal systems. People would be assigned based on country's knowladge about them of psychologists and civil servants, wchich would be large. The man's class in majority would dependes to his whife class , becouse as you have notice in every systems man's education doesn't difference to much. Collecting knowlagde would be more intensive, and begining from 11 age of human's live. The last class would be for patrialchal families , where that part of womans wouldn't have laws. But during further my considerations, I started doubt in this idea , becouse as the previous it require big country's control , but I used its fragments. 

I went to deduction about the possibillity , of doing that partly. My considerations wouldn't be full, if I wouldn't show , how to calclulate the detaility of thinking of a any person , from wchich this idea comes from to.The any problem being considered, can be compared to chinese characters. Right reading of character is from center to outside. Eyes of seeing person subconsciously imitates thinking process , therefore in people detaily thinking , the thinking goes to one of side during reading character , as result of wchich, the resetation happends, to go back, to the center of character and eyes with subconscious of that person makes a rotation, if the necessarity of doing that is bigger , the rotation is bigger to. You can calculate from it approximated indicator of holistisation. Bigger rotation (around whole eye ), we calculate doubly. It has different variants to. It can be divided by real time or by number of situations, when there was bigger necessarity to it added to one. You can further calculate aritmetical mean of holisticity of mans and take the laws of every persons with the indicator very bigger than it and in the next going to holistisation the society. It is not the best method for every countries ,but I would take in Arabic countries, begining in Sudan.

The fourth idea.

I would be going to it in majority of countries. It at once assumes holistisation of society, assuming , that other people 'll be exchanged , by time. Ultimately human's live is short. It assume deleting from market people preing by patriarchat, forcing by it a change of education. The only mans' element in mans' education in partriarchat is learning , that womans' education is other. Education should be one and universal. During my considerations, I have saw ,that other ways was for about and have a risk of rebellion, and that this elements are necessary to equality in every of this project anyway. Every people , who prey on patriarchat , should be deleted, by sanction as much as that business is unprofitable. Ultimately sancions won't exist , becouse , there won't be anybody , to be sanctioned. That is:

I Every companies , wchich produce toys for girls, ( From politics point of view, education is the tool, to formation the society. It should not be perceived , as taking the control. Human never has the free will. This politics gives human , the largest selection.)

II Every companies, wchich gives earings on childs ears.

III Florists. If we would think , from what is their business, we 'll notice, that they have got moneys , from primitive stimuli of human. The scientific researchs had showed , that choosing man of woman isn't very different , to that in gorrillas, so giving flowers to woman is sexual molestation, but I want , in the first negotiations with representatives of groups of them with the same way of looking on this reforms.

IV Every televisions , in wchich gives cartoons for kids with traces of patriarchat must be sanctioned.

V In Europe neccesary is teaching childs classic chinese in ages 7-10 of their lives. The teaching of latin writing system until in 11 year of live and should last one month. Chinese writing system is holistic and healthier than European, for brain. Only then every humans 'll can be equal. Let we go back to example of Japan. We can see there , that woman to be in military unit, musted have man from her family in it , and also every woman, who did something, exaple can be Takeko Nakano, had education with her brother.