How the Internet has changed chess: Part 1

Having been around organized chess for over 45 years I believe I am qualified to discuss this topic. It's going to be a pretty wide topic and I don't know yet how many parts this will become. What I do have to say should assist the ultimate goal which is to improve your skill level of chess play. Let's just go with the flow and enjoy the ride.  As for the position at the right, it's Black to play. Not to win, but to do the best he can. More on this below.


I ceased playing over the board tournaments in 1996 until the end of last year. However my involvement with chess continued during the interim. I was heavily involved in correspondence chess with ICCF from 1986 until the year 2000. I earned two qualifications to the World's championship cycle, and picked up a gold medal for Team USA in PATT#3. See my coaching page here for the link. I then dabbled in Internet chess play for the next dozen years. I remember in 1995 while in graduate school a few of my postal chess opponents directed me to to play chess online. Over the next few years while at work I dabbled at a few sites like Yahoo games. Finally in 2001 I purchased my first home computer and continued to play as many sites as I could find where chess was offered. Naturally I eventually gravitated exclusively to the premium quality sites. Here I was able to compete in a number of events using standard time controls like 90 30 and 45 45.


What I found was most players on the Internet like to play blitz chess. After all, the grandmasters are doing it, why not them? Let me back up a bit. I'll have more to say about blitz chess in a later article. When I was first playing club chess back in 1967 it was naturally all face-to-face. When I started playing correspondence chess at age 25 in 1980, I was one of the youngsters. As I have explained before my two years experience until 1982 with postal chess is the prime reason I acquired a national master title. I reentered postal chess in 1986 as I found it was the only way I could conveniently acquire master level opposition. The only other alternative to consistently play strong opponents was to move to Europe or New York City in order to play in master tournaments but these choices were impossible. 


As noted I was one of the younger players in postal chess and suspect that the majority of my prior opponents have since retired or passed on. In the old days we played by postcard and the post office had custody of our moves the majority of the duration of the game. This led to games lasting anywhere from nine months to three years. I consider this quite normal. Players today look at this and wonder how I possibly could have coped with such slowness. After all, today postal chess is played online and transmission of the moves is instantaneous. Many postal chess players today who play online are under the misconception online chess is a substitute for over the board play and if their opponent happens to be online the same day they are, they will exchange as many moves as they possibly can with them. I have noticed a lot of players have in excess of 50 games going which is way too many to devote the proper attention each game requires. So somehow the methods of the old guard that I belong to have been lost. This is largely because players are introduced to organized chess today through the Internet. We folks of the older generation had easy access to literature and articles of how postal chess can improve your game that the new generation is unaware of.


As noted above correspondence chess is how I became a chess master by learning how to analyze, evaluate, and assess positions. It is a perfect way to learn openings because you get to look them up as you play them. Naturally proper endgame technique can be mastered as well. When you're at a chess club and complete a tournament game you often conduct a postmortem analysis of the game with your opponent. Here you're moving the pieces around looking at possible variations and you're learning. The exact same thing is true when analyzing a postal chess game. I know of a FIDE IM who played hundreds of simultaneous postal games as training for over the board games. When he got a move in the mail he would set the board up start the chess clock and spend about as much time on the position is if he were playing a real game all while not moving the chess pieces. Although this may have helped his over the board play his postal chess suffered. His opponents were trained to take hours on a move and this is too much of a time advantage to grant a theoretically weaker chess player than you. The IM was usually punished for playing quickly. If you take your time you should play at a much higher level of chess. I know of several chess players with over the board ratings of 1600-1900 who achieved legitimate postal chess ratings of 2200 and higher.


Now I would like to share a famous example of how analysis of a chess position can achieve a win in correspondence chess. American Hans Berliner won  the fifth world's correspondence championship in 1965. A senior master strength player he participated in three US championships that Bobby Fischer played in, with reasonable results. He then turned his attention to postal chess play and qualified for the world's championship finals. As black he played the Alekhine’s Defense to 1.e4 but he found himself with Black against Yakov Estrin of the Soviet Union who was also the world's leading authority on the Two Knights Defense. Hans studied Estrin’s opening literature and found a flaw. Much has been written about this position, and I give a link to find out more, but let's suffice it to say that the position at the top of the page was considered by Estrin to be winning for White.


No telling how many hours Berliner devoted to Estrin's work or even this position but suffice it to say he did a thorough enough analysis at this point and throughout the rest of the game to bring home the point. In other words Berliner did his homework and succeeded. You can too. Every position you reach can be dissected at your leisure until you are satisfied you've found the best move in the position. If it isn't the best move your opponent will show you why and you'll learn from him. Your skill level will rise jn chess the more you analyze, and correspondence chess is a perfect method to help you learn!


Part two will follow soon!


  • 19 months ago


    Great article!

  • 3 years ago


    Bill I still play at caissa and have been a memeber there since 1998. mabe we played there. I am a memeber here since 2011 and have enjoyed your insight and videos. Great article.

  • 3 years ago


    easy to play, hard to master

  • 4 years ago


    Vey interesting. I know that on other sites they push for 45/45 games,but I really like correspondence chess at this site.

  • 4 years ago


    First of all, let me say that I am probably the WORST chess player I've ever known. ahah! Having that said...  these days correspondence chess is one of my greatest pleasures of the day: just sitting around, during work breaks, me and my drink and a chessboard (and I insist on thinking the games on the board, not on the screen) and I truly get carried away from this world. I tried blitz and bullet once (actually, YESTERDAY!, one I actually tried, the other one the game started and I didn't even realize that) but definetely that's not for me... I like to take my time. Doesn't mean I play better but it sure means that I have more fun while doing it!

  • 4 years ago


    great article im waiting for part 2

  • 4 years ago


    Great Article Bill! And and I'm convinced that your "make haste slowly" approach is right on target!

  • 4 years ago


    I really really liked this post as it relates to many of the ideas I have thought of.

    I started playing chess in 2001 at the age of 29.  I played chess at the Houston chess club and online.  I played sporadically up until recently when I have started playing more correspondence online games.

    One of the most fun things I can think of to do is to take an actual board and study chess books.  I do this at work in the library on my breaks, and at home in between sets of weightlifting, and as much as I have time.  The slowness of the study and examining and trying to understand each move is fascinating.  I try to regain the feel for games and can almost hear the surroundings of the game and the thoughts of the players as I go through the games even though I was not there.  By doing this I cut off completely the isolation and disconnection that the internet provides.

    I cannot stand the shallowness of blitz games, which is really like driving a car in traffic.  For me mostly the other slow drivers get in the way.  But chess is not about speed, its about depth and precision.  If I want speed, I can do kickboxing, which I have trained in.

    In this article you note length of time of games.  I also play correspondence Go(wei-chi) which involves a 19x19 grid with around 365 moves per game sometimes.  I have 4 games going with one move every 4 weeks.  So possibly these games could last many years.  In fact I just completed a game started in 10/2011 at  and I have some games with 365 days per move at  With this length of time I can be assured of really getting to know the game and allowing myself to grow over time with the game.  This satisfaction isnt achieved in blitz games which are about as exciting as watching paint dry.

    I started studying chess more lately instead of Go, because if computers were eliminated I would be playing chess as it is more widely available offline and there arent any people locally and I would play Go with, because the Calgary wei chi or Go club sucks, whereas the chess clubs are appealing to me.  I like the old school approach and I regularly print off games and then go study them with my portable board, at work.  Again the quietness of the study without being encumbered by the noise that is the internet and alls its societal disconnect is refreshing.

  • 4 years ago


    Thank you for the article! Although postal chess is ideal way to improve on chessplay,there are many players who get computer assistance. I wonder how do you deal with those (hope you discuss this in future articles!)?

    On the other hand, some people may be wrongly accused of getting computer assistance.

    Maybe computer software may have influenced chess more than internet.

  • 4 years ago


    Great article! Would Love to see more!

  • 4 years ago



    This almost sounds like an essay for college or university. I've had to write about how modern technology has changed things before Wink.

Back to Top

Post your reply: