Mestel-Nunn, 1982
Mestel vs Nunn, 1982
This post was co-written with Geoff Goodson.
We covered some of John Nunn’s biography in an earlier post. As mentioned, he has a PhD in mathematics. Here are a few more details of his mathematical background. His 1978 thesis, entitled “Some problems in algebraic topology,” supervised by John Hubbuck, resulted in the publication:
J.D.M. Nunn, “The homotopy types of finite H-spaces,” Topology 18 (1979), no. 1, 17–28. In 1981, Nunn left Oxford University to pursue chess professionally. In addition to Nunn’s solution to problems in topology, he is also involved with the composition of chess problems. He won the World Chess Solving Championship in 2004, where he earned his final GM norm in problem solving. He won the World Solving Championship again in 2007 and in 2010.
More recently, in 2022 at age 67, Nunn won the World 65+ Senior Chess Championship in Assisi, Italy.
Andrew Jonathan Mestel (1957-03-13 to present) in Cambridge, England) is Professor of Applied Mathematics at Imperial College London, working in magnetohydrodynamics and biological fluid dynamics. He obtained his PhD in 1982 with the thesis "Magnetic Levitation of Liquid Metals" at University of Cambridge. His university web page lists numerous research publications (many available for download as a pdf), several as recent as 2022.
A distinguished chess player, he was the first person to be awarded chess Grandmaster titles by FIDE in both over-the-board play and problem solving. He has also represented England at contract bridge.
Mestel was awarded the Grandmaster (GM) title in 1982 and became a Chess Solving Grandmaster and the World Chess Solving Champion in 1997. With John Nunn, he is a medal-winning member of the British Chess Solving Team. (Above photo is by John Saunders, https://www.flickr.com/photos/johnchess2/).
From the 1950s to the 1990s, FIDE organized a series of tournaments to select candidates for the world chess championship. The world was divided into distinct zones. First, each FIDE member nation would hold a national championship, with the top players qualifying for the Zonal tournament. The top players in each Zonal tournament would meet in the Interzonal tournament. Those top players would move on to the Candidates tournament. (Since 2005, the zonal and interzonal tournament system has gone away. The As of 2022, to qualify for the Candidates tournament, there are several options described here.)
The following 1982 game was played in Leiden, as part of a zonal playoff.
Nunn was black and Mestel was white and they played the Najdorf variation B92 of the Sicilian defense.
- e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 Nf6 4. Nc3 cxd4 5. Nxd4 a6 6. Be2 e5 7. Nb3 Be7 8. a4 O-O 9. O-O Be6 10. f4 exf4 11. Bxf4 Nc6 12. Kh1 d5 13. e5 Nd7 14. Nxd5 Ndxe5 15. Nxe7+ Qxe7 16. Qe1 Rfe8
As we will see, the rook is awkwardly placed on the e8 square. Other moves, such as …Bc4, …f6, or …Rad8 come to mind.
- Qg3 Qb4

This sets up a simple trap that white doesn’t fall for (Bxe5, Nxe5, Qxe5??, Bxb3). Better was …f6.
- Bh6 Ng6 19. Bd2 Qe4 20. Bd3 Qe5 21. Qf2 Qxb2 22. Rab1 Qf6
Probably not the best, as the endgame with two bishops favors white. Other tries were … Qa3 or …Qe5.
- Qxf6 gxf6 24. Nc5 Nce5
Not the best, in our view. Other moves to consider here were … f5 or … Nge5.
- Ne4 Red8 26. Nxf6+ Kg7 27. Nh5+ Kg8 28. Ba5 Rdc8 29. Rxb7 Nxd3 30. cxd3 Rc2
Probably not the best move in this position. Better is Rab8, hoping to simplify into an endgame with opposite colored bishops. With … Rc2 it seems like black thinks he can play … Rxg2, Kxg2, Bd5+ winning back the rook and gaining a pawn. However, white can play … Rxg2, Nf6+, K-any, Kxg2 and now Bd5+ is not available as the knight covers that square.
- h3 Rac8 32. Bb6 Rd2 33. d4 Kh8 34. Nf6 Bc4 35. Rc1 Nh4
Protecting the f7 pawn with Kg7 was better, but black is in serious trouble. Perhaps black was hoping to somehow trade his f7 pawn for white’s g2 pawn? The black knight and black bishop are being shut out of the game.
- Bc7 Ba2 37. Ne4 1-0
