Another Little Genius??

Another Little Genius??

IM dpruess
Oct 28, 2011, 10:37 AM |

[previous round]

In round 5 of the Western States Open, I was surprised to be paired with young (12 yrs old?) Luke Harmon-Vellotti of Idaho. Despite losing in round 4 I had 3/4 and I thought that I should still be in line for an IM or GM. I thought I had played Luke in the previous year's National Open and that he had been barely a 2000 level at the time, so I was surprised that he'd have 3 points.

But when I sat down to play him, I saw that his rating was 2292, not just a master now, but a strong one! And I remembered that the night before I had seen him playing against John Daniel Bryant, a strong 2400 player. Uh-oh! Afraid of losing the game at the outset by knowing less opening theory than him (on the chance that he studies opening theory), I reluctantly decided while thinking on my first move to switch from my intended 1.e4 to 1.c4. I've been making that decision more and more often lately, and I want to feel free to play e4, and stop being so worried. My goal for round 5 was actually simply to play 1.e4 in order to help myself get over this growing fear. But during the first minute or two of the game while I thought about my move, another thought occured to me: perhaps my better results lately were partly due to the fact that I had been employing some fear and prudence, rather than just brashly playing the wild stuff I like.

And so, once again, prudence got the better of me, and another English game unfolded:

(for those who are interested in the common structure that arose in this game, check out this terrific article).

Luke played extremely well, and pretty confidently as well, I would say, within the confines of a worrisome position. Whereas the first time I played him I thought he was not even worth his rating, he now appears to me to be worth *more* his much-improved rating. I was really impressed. And he finished the tournament with the better side of a draw (with black again!) against scary-good IM Mackenzie Molner, to finish undefeated and push his rating over 2300. Wow!

It turns out, my previous encounter with him was in 2009 not 2010, so it makes some sense that he has improved so much, though it's still an extraordinary progress. And it turns out that this year he made his first IM norm at a tournament where he defeated two GMs. So, definitely another important young talent in the American chess scene.

As for me, I was definitely disappointed not to win this game. It felt like I had been so close, and it had slipped away from me; and it left me really questioning my focus. Had I blinked at some point? Not made quite enough effort at the moment I needed to? Should I not have strolled around the room and lost a minute here or there off my clock? (I used to sit still at the board pretty much till the end of a game, but at this tournament I drank water, strolled the hall, checked out other games, and went to the bathroom: it was more enjoyable and I got less tired, and that has its advantages as well).

But, I knew that my main goal at this event was "the first and last," so after lunching, I put this game behind me, and thought only of the main event.

[last round]