Nova Daily - 14 June 2025: 10 minutes of brainstorming

Nova Daily - 14 June 2025: 10 minutes of brainstorming

Avatar of nova-stone
| 2

Hi!

Exactly two months ago to the day, I decided to write a text on inspiration. I sat down for about 10 minutes and came up with a list of 28 topics. It may have been more, but this was the speed at which I was able to type the ideas into a text file on my phone. The version presented in my blog was worked out properly.

Several of those topics were off-limits for what I wanted to write over the last two months. Cheating is a rewarding topic, but writing about it is rather precarious. Celebrities might be its own topic one day, but I'm not exactly motivated by it because it's usually a more fun read to have something delightful, engaging, and fun, and my dislike of them could make for a very bitter text. Besides, they are doing their stuff in their own way and have success with it. If I apply the "Live and let live" idea, I should just shut up about them and acknowledge that they're in fact doing a good job keeping chess popular. No matter how much I hold some of them in derision.

Quite some of the topics did find their way into my blog, and I feared that my pool of topics might dry up a bit. So it was time for:

“All of humanity's problems stem from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone.” - Blaise Pascal

10 minutes of brainstorming


I decided to sit down and jot down everything that crossed my mind. I got a list of 40 different topics within those ten minutes. I'll be honest with you, though: one of these 40 topics was already on my mind before it, and I decided to put it in the place of one thought that I won't bother you with.

  1. The question about methods: "Does it work?"
  2. The idea of pragmatism
  3. My thoughts on AI-generated text
  4. Rameshbabu Praggnanandhaa
  5. Rameshbabu Vaishali
  6. A whole generation of Indian rising stars
  7. My favourite chess-player
  8. Popularity contests and polls
  9. Chess journalism
  10. Doing book reviews
    Too many books to review, too little time
  11. Author and CC Director of News and Events Peter Doggers
  12. Peter's book The Chess Revolution
  13. Arne Moll's The Center Game
  14. Openings
  15. Badly written books
  16. Pet peeves in books
  17. My thoughts on blogging
  18. The BlogChamps and Blogger Awards contests
  19. Deciding to judge for The Blogger Awards June
  20. Criteria by which I'll judge blogs

    What people think the judging will be
  21. Twitch streams
  22. Words On Stream
  23. Languages
  24. The New In Chess magazine, and the inspiration for topics that that could bring
  25. Detective series
  26. Fun television shows
  27. Bingewatching series
  28. Pokémon
  29. Pokémon members at BlogChamps
  30. Speedruns

    Some people stretch the limits of their videogames so far beyond breaking point that even the sun becomes judgemental.
  31. The YouTuber JRose11 and his solo runs in Pokémon games
  32. The PogChamps event
  33. The Dr.Lupo cheating scandal
  34. The YouTuber Karl Jobst and his video on the Dr.Lupo situation
  35. Witch hunts in chess
  36. Poorly executed scams
  37. Hilarious scams in history
  38. How to write your text
  39. Sitting still, alone in a room
  40. Brainstorming

And thus, after 40 topics, my brainstorming has gone full-circle.

What judging really looks like.

Some topics keep coming back because I'm occupying myself a lot with it. I can see a pattern about these, which is content. Writing takes up a lot of mental space, and so do different multimedia outlets such as YouTube and Twitch.

The topic of TBA and my judging for the month of June will be its own blog. But of course I'm only going to start on that one after my work on it will be finished. So far I'm still enjoying reading the texts, and we're currently at 10 submissions.

If anyone feels inspired to write something about any of these topics: please take them away. I'll be looking forward to seeing your text!


Yesterday's game


Yesterday's game turned out to be far from perfect. On several occasions I messed up or chose the wrong plan, which made my position worse and maybe even borderline lost. However, you know the Tartakower quote about who wins the game of chess:

The winner of the game is the player who makes the next-to-last mistake.


- Savielly Tartakower

And so it was.


What can I take away from this game:


  1. I should remain true to my repertoire. There were several ways to transpose into Caro-Kann territory if I had traded on d4 and pushed d5 straight after. Panov positions can crop up in many different opening variations, and this fact alone proves that it's worth learning the Caro-Kann.
  2. Engine's best isn't always human best. The idea to sacrifice the f-pawn on f4 and make the kingside completely static was best according to the engine, but I wouldn't have done that idea unless I wanted to make a draw or unless I'd be able to find a way in.
  3. In the endgame, be stingy with pushing pawns. Look at the way Carlsen treats endgames.

Working daily to fashion myself a complete and durable opening repertoire. New text every day. Weekly recaps on Sunday.