A BUST TO THE KING'S GAMBIT, R. J. Fischer
A BUST TO THE KING'S GAMBIT
by U.S. Champion Bobby Fischer
The King's Gambit has lost popularity, but not sympathy.
Analysts treat it with kid gloves and seem reluctant to
demonstrate an outright refuatation. "The Chessplayers Manual"
by Gossip and Lipschutz, published in 1874, devotes 237 pages
to this gambit without arriving at a conclusion. To this day
the opening has been analyzed romantically - not
scientifically. Moderns seem to share the same unconscious
attitude that caused the old-timers to curse stubborn Steinitz:
"He took the beauty out of chess."
To the public, the player of the King's Gambit exhibits courage
and derring-do. The gambit has been making a comeback with the
younger Soviet masters, notably Spassky (who defeated
Bronstein, Averbach and myself with it). His victories rarely
reflected the merits of the opening since his opponents went
wrong in the mid-game. It is often the case, also, as with
Santasiere and Bronstein, that the King's Gambit is played with
a view to a favorable endgame. Spassky told me himself the
gambit doesn't give White much, but he plays it because neither
does the Ruy Lopez nor the Giuoco Piano.
The refuatation of any gambit begins with accepting it. In my
opinion the King's Gambit is busted. It loses by force.
This is the key to a troublesome position, a high-class
"waiting move." At Mar Del Plata, 1959, I played 3...P-KN4
against Spassky, but this is inexact because it gives White
leads to an ending where Black's extra Pawn is neutralized by
White's stranglehold on the dark squares, especially KB4.
Another good try, but also inexact, is the Berlin Defense:
where Black cannot demonstrate any advantage.
Of course 3...P-Q4 equalizes easily, but that's all.
4 P-Q4 transposes, the only difference if White tries to force
and with his King and Queen reversed, Black wins easily.
This in conjunction with Black's previous move I would like to
call the Berlin Defense Deferred. By this subtle transposition
Black knocks out the possibility open to White in the last note
(to move 3).
Here there is disagreement as to Black's best move. Puc and
Rabar, Euwe, Keres, and most analysts give the text as the main
best because there is no reason why Black should not strive to
There is little practical experience with this sub-variation.
betray their soft-mindedness toward this opening by giving the
This is yet another example of sentimental evaluation -
after 12...Q-K2 followed by B-R6 and 0-0-0 Black wins easily.
The Pawn on KB6 is a bone in White's throat so why force him to sacrifice when he must
10...Q-K2 is the strongest move.
In this last variation (instead of 10 N-Q2) White can vary with
10 Q-N3 but then comes Nimzovitch's beautiful winning line:
18...P-Q4 followed by N-K2 with a winning game for Black.
Again theoretical disagreement. Perfectly good is 9...P-N5!
11 RxP - given by analysts again as "unclear,"
but after N-B3 followed by 0-0, White has nothing for the piece.
A wild position, but Black is still master.
owing to the threat of R-R8+.
And Black wins...
Of course White can always play differently, in which case he merely loses differently.