Vienna Game 2... d6 | BLUFFS! Psychological Tactics!
#vienna #chesspsychology
Occasionally, you'll play a game where the computer analysis is difficult to understand. In this game, some of the positions were rather complicated, and the computer would suggest relatively inhuman lines. What I mean is that there are sometimes lines that are slightly better evaluation wise, but only when you play very accurately. One error, and the opponent is ahead.
This game started with a Vienna Game with the "Philidor-ish" defense (1. e4 e5 2. Nc3 d6). The game almost immediately turned down an unusual path with Black defending their e-pawn with a queen move (3. d4 Qe7). Now, I knew that this couldn't possibly be good having analysed the position previously, but how to gain an advantage? I played (4. Nd5) chasing the queen for tempo (4... Qd8). However, although Black wasted two moves, arguably it was also premature for my knight to be on the d5 as it was liable to being kicked by c6 and I had insufficient development.
Here, Stockfish gives a curious recommendation on move 5. It suggests (5. Bg5), which straight up hangs the bishop! Now, although it is true that we'll get Nxc7+, forcing the king the move, and then allowing a capture of the Black rook, is it actually better for White? Stockfish thinks so, but the evaluation is only slightly better (by about +0.5) compared to playing more solidly. I find it difficult to recommend Stockfish's recommendation here as there are many things that can go wrong down that line!
On move 12, Stockfish makes another fearless recommendation. Black's queen has just moved to a6 with an attack on our undefended a2 pawn after we have castled queenside. So, I played (12. Kb1) in the game, usually a good move and defending a2. However, Stockfish was completely unafraid and simply recommended a cool central pawn capture (dxe5) and allowing Qxa2! Frankly, the queen capture looks terrifying with a potential mate, damaged king defence, and no obvious way that the black queen would be trapped. And again, the difference is evaluation is from [+4.3 → +3] making Stockfish's risky play hardly worthwhile!
On move 18, I had the option of capturing Black's d5 pawn with either my bishop or my pawn on e4. I took with the bishop, which led it to be defended in the centre of the board by the e4 pawn. Stockfish, however, suggested capturing the with the pawn, which would result in isolated doubled d-pawns and isolated doubled f-pawns, was better! Like in the other positions, it was difficult to see why this would be better.
Now, what this means in this game is that the computer evaluation needs to be taken with a grain of salt in understanding the psychological evaluation flow. The position was complex and unbalanced. Black had one additional piece but was only up one point of material. I had a substantial majority of pawns, better development, and a king that wasn't exposed in the centre. Although the position was in my favour at times, or close to equal, I suspected that I was winning the psychological brinksmanship in the game.
On move 22, I made a psychological attack with (22. Bxf7+)! Now, this LOOKED like a bishop sacrifice with check and frankly, had the appearance of a trap. However, it completely a bluff! Black was spooked and after thinking for a minute, declined to capture my bishop (which was their best move) and moved their king out of check (22... Kd8), which was a blunder [+4.5] giving me now a winning advantage!
With Black now having cemented in their mind the idea that I'm making sacrificial traps, I now employed this bluff tactic a second time on move 25. Black had moved their knight to h6 the previous move to attack my bishop, the same bishop, still on f7. However, rather than moving it out of the way, I instead play (25. Rhd1) seemingly baiting Black to capture the bishop, once again, looking like a trap. Black, once again spooked, declined to take the bishop and once again, game me a massive advantage [+5.7]!
On move 30, we enter the endgame where Black's king was isolated from their other pieces. I chase the king with checks and on move 33, Black blunders by playing (33... Ka5) which traps their king on the a-file with impending checkmate, other than some spite checks to delay. Black, now chooses to let their clock run out for over 6 minutes, which was rather annoying. Don't be that person! Even if you're annoyed or disappointed at your position, play with good sportsmanship. In any case, I win when Black times out.
The big takeaways from this game is to that you need to look at Stockfish evaluations with context. Best engine moves might result in lines that are difficult to play. Secondly, your opponents are human! Psychological brinksmanship includes using bluffs!
Game on chess.com: https://www.chess.com/game/live/84513153715
