50. Rxh4
007 thenomalnoob vs Green_Sleeves
Sort:
51. Kd3
Aug 25, 2023
0
#124
Hey, do you want to implement Bare Piece Rule, or just keep playing without it? It won’t affect any of our previous moves, it’s just a slightly different win condition.
https://www.chess.com/announcements/view/ahab-chess-rules-adjustment
Yes, but I suggest to modify it that:
If you only have the rook, you will lose if in your next turn RIGHT after you opps capture your pernultimate piece, you can't capture your opps' one.
52. Ke4
Aug 25, 2023
0
#128
thenomalnoob wrote:
Yes, but I suggest to modify it that:
If you only have the rook, you will lose if in your next turn RIGHT after you opps capture your pernultimate piece, you can't capture your opps' one.
Exactly, that’s how the bare piece rule functions. The game ends on the spot.
I meant that
not that
53. Rg4
Aug 25, 2023
0
#132
thenomalnoob wrote:
I meant that
not that
Oh, gotcha.
Well, that seems a bit too custom to me, but that's a possibility. I would imagine that if it was down to that point in the game, you could maneuver both your pieces to keep them from getting captured, at which case you'd just agree to a draw.
Why don't you suggest that on the announcement that I linked to, and people can discuss it there.
54. Kxf5
Aug 25, 2023
0
#135
Doh, forgot this was Ahab chess XD King is a normal piece.
54. ... Nxf5
lol, is your ahab the knight? I can kill it just by 2 rooks!
My Ahab, you may have known, is the remaining rook!
Aug 25, 2023
0
#139
Yup, my Ahab was my knight. But now you can take my pawn and end the game.
