https://www.chess.com/game/live/139486134926
GOTW (Game of the Week) Submission Forum Week 3
Sort:
Jun 11, 2025
0
#2
Jun 11, 2025
0
#3
Now in this game I just focused to attack my opponent as far as possible. While strengthening my pawn structure
Jun 11, 2025
0
#4
Mythical_Tiger wrote:
Also just a reminder, if you annotate your game, your game will have a better chance of getting chosen as the best one.
Annotating basically means narrating the game and sharing your thoughts about moves.
Look at the above text
Jun 11, 2025
0
#5
Mythical_Tiger wrote:
Mythical_Tiger wrote:
Also just a reminder, if you annotate your game, your game will have a better chance of getting chosen as the best one.
Annotating basically means narrating the game and sharing your thoughts about moves.
Look at the above text
People never do it, Tiger😅
- The rest of the game seems self-explanatory for me, i simply made sure that my knight and my flank pawn stops my opponent pawns from promotion and i promoted a Queen myself.
I hope this was either fun or instructive 
Jun 12, 2025
0
#7
Aymen-17 wrote:
https://www.chess.com/game/live/138301822810
move 5 : the theoretical move here is Qf3, even though i was aware of it i always prefer Nxe4 because it's something i am more comfortable with.
move 11: i played Qe2 because if i castled instead e2+ would have cost me a queen.
move 13: capturing the free definitely seemed very natural to me although the engine give castling at that move almost +3.
move 18: my opponent unfortunately hang a knight here, although he spent around 14 seconds on his move, he probably just overlooked it.
move 26: even though i already lost a pawn on move 23 i didn't to lose 2 others as i believed i was heading into a winning endgame.
move 33: a5+ from him could have been correct in a lot of situations since it is theoretically right to try to trade pawns if you are down a minor piece in an endgame, but here it doesn't work because of Rc1 threatening back rank mate.
- The rest of the game seems self-explanatory for me, i simply made sure that my knight and my flank pawn stops my opponent pawns from promotion and i promoted a Queen myself.
I hope this was either fun or instructive
A very nice game! But, this isn’t annotating, but it will do, thanks!
NeoChess9 wrote:
Aymen-17 wrote:
https://www.chess.com/game/live/138301822810
move 5 : the theoretical move here is Qf3, even though i was aware of it i always prefer Nxe4 because it's something i am more comfortable with.
move 11: i played Qe2 because if i castled instead e2+ would have cost me a queen.
move 13: capturing the free definitely seemed very natural to me although the engine give castling at that move almost +3.
move 18: my opponent unfortunately hang a knight here, although he spent around 14 seconds on his move, he probably just overlooked it.
move 26: even though i already lost a pawn on move 23 i didn't to lose 2 others as i believed i was heading into a winning endgame.
move 33: a5+ from him could have been correct in a lot of situations since it is theoretically right to try to trade pawns if you are down a minor piece in an endgame, but here it doesn't work because of Rc1 threatening back rank mate.
- The rest of the game seems self-explanatory for me, i simply made sure that my knight and my flank pawn stops my opponent pawns from promotion and i promoted a Queen myself.
I hope this was either fun or instructive
A very nice game! But, this isn’t annotating, but it will do, thanks!
thank you, there were a few grammar mistakes that i corrected, could you please explain more what annotations means?
Jun 12, 2025
0
#11
That’s great that you won against a GM, but a 30 game almost has no chance of winning
Jun 12, 2025
0
#12
Aymen-17 wrote:
NeoChess9 wrote:
Aymen-17 wrote:
https://www.chess.com/game/live/138301822810
move 5 : the theoretical move here is Qf3, even though i was aware of it i always prefer Nxe4 because it's something i am more comfortable with.
move 11: i played Qe2 because if i castled instead e2+ would have cost me a queen.
move 13: capturing the free definitely seemed very natural to me although the engine give castling at that move almost +3.
move 18: my opponent unfortunately hang a knight here, although he spent around 14 seconds on his move, he probably just overlooked it.
move 26: even though i already lost a pawn on move 23 i didn't to lose 2 others as i believed i was heading into a winning endgame.
move 33: a5+ from him could have been correct in a lot of situations since it is theoretically right to try to trade pawns if you are down a minor piece in an endgame, but here it doesn't work because of Rc1 threatening back rank mate.
- The rest of the game seems self-explanatory for me, i simply made sure that my knight and my flank pawn stops my opponent pawns from promotion and i promoted a Queen myself.
I hope this was either fun or instructive
A very nice game! But, this isn’t annotating, but it will do, thanks!
thank you, there were a few grammar mistakes that i corrected, could you please explain more what annotations means?
Ok! It seems like there is a lot of confusion about annotation, I will make an announcement about it!
Jun 12, 2025
0
#13
I'll link the annotating announcment in next week's sumbisson forum
Jun 17, 2025
0
#20
https://www.chess.com/analysis/library/5CQp93TkGn?tab=analysis
I annotated, but i could not attach the game for some reason
Hello everyone, here you can submit games from chess.com to win for week 3.
Each week, whoever has the best chess game will be added to the leaderboard.
Also just a reminder, if you annotate your game, your game will have a better chance of getting chosen as the best one.
Annotating basically means narrating the game and sharing your thoughts about moves.
Also add a link to the game to make things easy.
Deadline: Tuesday 6/17, Voting: Tuesday-Wednesday 6/17-6/18, Week 4 submission forum postage: Wednesday 6/18
For more information check out this announcement and this one also.
If you don’t know how to annotate, check out this announcement