FWIW, on mine it says I'm 1of 1 in spotting king forks, in ~880 rapid games. 1 of 2 in 4.2k bullet games, and it says I have no king forks in ~2k blitz games.
I'm sure the king is the rarest forker out of all the pieces, but I'm surprised it's that low. 0:2000 is even more surprising, especially as you mention being congratulated for finding one recently ![]()
Out of curiosity, are your stats also coming out of blitz games (where I also have the 0 out of ~2k?) You mention "all formats" but I don't see how to combine blitz/daily/rapid/bullet all in to one lumped category (maybe I'm a bit dense this morning, I havent had my coffee yet, but I dont see how to do it!).
PS - I think this post very much belongs here!! I am skeptical about some of these stats as well.






Before anyone say this isn't Beta related, I'm assuming that any changes to Insights would appear in Beta first.
I also note that Unlimited Insights is one of the main justifications for paying extra for a Diamond Membership.
Some of these may not be bugs, they may just been down to my erratic play, it is hard to say, which is why I thought I'd open a topic on it here to try and pin down what is what.
1. Apparently in over 2000 games in all formats I have never found a fork with a king.
I thought perhaps this was possible, but a few days ago I was congratulated in the coach explanation in the review (the other main justification for Diamond Membership) for finding a fork with my king. It was only a pawn and a minor piece, but it counts bishop forks between a pawn and a rook (credited in the same time period and format).
I think this is a bug and I have reported it but had no feedback on it as yet. Does anyone have any count above zero for King forks?
2. Insights does not reflect the new move classifications. It has never, to my knowledge, reflected 'Great Moves'. (I believe I reported the absence of Great Moves as a bug months ago, but I wouldn't swear to it).
3. I'm not sure what constitutes a 'Balanced Game' classification, but I find it hard to believe that I have a) just 12 in all formats in over 2000 games and b) I won the 12 out of 12 Insights has classed as 'balanced'.
Again, this may be something to do with my playing style, but it doesn't quite ring true to me.
I have lots of suggestions for improving Insights, but it seems pointless submitting them when clearly things are already not all they should be.
Worse, because of what appears to be some obvious oversights, I'm sceptical about the figures that are shown, which makes the whole feature fairly useless - even more than 'performance based on geography'!