NCP: Octagon

Sort:
playnmake

Gamerules: Ox2, NZ, 7th, =RBNKG

Time control: 3/4|1

First version (3/4|2, YZ):

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=10166953-16

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=10167318

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=10167375-11

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=10178109

Second Version (3/4|2, NZ):

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=10177734

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=10178199

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=10178241

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=10189269

Another Second Version (3/4|1, YZ, Created on Accident):

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=10196217-133

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=10196350

Final Version (3/4|1, NZ):

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=10196119-34

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=10196163

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=10196273

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=10196310

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=10199758-22

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=10205907

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=10206121

 

 

 

playnmake

It may need a better title

CGA
e(3log12*pi(432)^89)*6.941e-235 < 70 ? ..yes!
Hooray! You've met all the requirements!
Under Review
stupnik_2_0
playnmake je napisao/la:

It may need a better title

It may need better position.
This is not unique.

Bb8fan1

looks nice!

playnmake
CGA wrote:
e(3log12*pi(432)^89)*6.941e-235 < 70 ? ..yes!
Hooray! You've met all the requirements!

Johnplaysvariants

ok

its fine

BoxJellyfishChess
kevinmiles2 wrote:

not suitable for NCP

Agreed, teaming is off the charts.

However, a sharper version of this would make an interesting WoF. I don't remember any "sharp mini-4-player game" WoFs, so that would solve the uniqueness problem as well. In fact, one of the earlier versions might just work.

TheUltraTrap

This kinda seems like inspiration of mini 8pc, was that the idea?

MayimChayim

lol

TheUltraTrap
MayimChayim wrote:

lol

In talking serious, the creator is an 8pc player in fact, he might have done this with inspiration from 8pc

playnmake
TheUltraTrap wrote:

This kinda seems like inspiration of mini 8pc, was that the idea?

no

playnmake
BoxJellyfishChess wrote:
kevinmiles2 wrote:

not suitable for NCP

Agreed, teaming is off the charts.

However, a sharper version of this would make an interesting WoF. I don't remember any "sharp mini-4-player game" WoFs, so that would solve the uniqueness problem as well. In fact, one of the earlier versions might just work.

People team on you, and you team on them for the rematch

MrXX2018
playnmake написал:
CGA wrote:
e(3log12*pi(432)^89)*6.941e-235 < 70 ? ..yes!
Hooray! You've met all the requirements!

 

playnmake

I found some more variants from 2 yrs ago that definitely won't be accepted

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=1576368-102

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=1576300-0

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=1576244-0

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=1574760

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=1572149-0

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=1570071-0

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=1569743-0

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=1382720

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=1293615

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=1680464-137

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=1680324

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=1641455-0

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=1540276-0

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=1376417-0

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=1055326 <- old tic tac toe by QIlIP not qilp

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=1055282

 

And these were all removed

playnmake
CGA wrote:
e(3log12*pi(432)^89)*6.941e-235 < 70 ? ..yes!
Hooray! You've met all the requirements!

It would be easier if you did 1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1=12

stupnik_2_0
playnmake je napisao/la:
CGA wrote:
e(3log12*pi(432)^89)*6.941e-235 < 70 ? ..yes!
Hooray! You've met all the requirements!

It would be easier if you did 1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1=12

What is derivative of x+sqrt(x)tg(x)/arsh(x)?

grable

Lots of fun. I'm not sure if everyone commenting "bUT tHeRE's TEaMiNG," above knows that it's Ox2, but that definitely goes a long way to mitigating any potential double-attacks. Maybe it's not perfectly balanced, but it's closer to being an NCP than a WoF. We like it!

 

CGA-Accept.png

Now, can anyone show me how to give a checkmate with R+K vs K?

playnmake
grable wrote:

Lots of fun. I'm not sure if everyone commenting "bUT tHeRE's TEaMiNG," above knows that it's Ox2, but that definitely goes a long way to mitigating any potential double-attacks. Maybe it's not perfectly balanced, but it's closer to being an NCP than a WoF. We like it!

 

 

Now, can anyone show me how to give a checkmate with R+K vs K? <-----------



playnmake
grable wrote:

Lots of fun. I'm not sure if everyone commenting "bUT tHeRE's TEaMiNG," above knows that it's Ox2, but that definitely goes a long way to mitigating any potential double-attacks. Maybe it's not perfectly balanced, but it's closer to being an NCP than a WoF. We like it!

 

 

Now, can anyone show me how to give a checkmate with R+K vs K?

Finally I got accepted, and this was my 1st NPC game

I think I will create NPCs from now on