I updated the definition a bit, I think that's a pretty accurate description of spam.
Unsolicited messages, usually of witless, immaterial or commercial nature, sent to a large number of recipients or posted in a large number of places with the purpose of drawing attention or causing disruption.
How did you update the definition created by another member? I don't see that update. Must be another multiple edited post. Confusing at least
Well, please point me to the definition given by that other member? I used the Webster's Dictionary Def as a baseline and refined it to better fit my interpretation of spam. You do at least notice a difference here I hope?
Webster's definition > Unsolicited usually commercial messages (such as e-mails, text messages, or Internet postings) sent to a large number of recipients or posted in a large number of places. (Link)
My definition > Unsolicited messages, usually of witless, immaterial or commercial nature, sent to a large number of recipients or posted in a large number of places with the purpose of drawing attention or causing disruption.
You like editing your posts, adding things after a response.
Do I really need to direct you to the OP?
I know you guys have all been spammed at least a couple of times, and that you have been really annoyed or hurt by them. Spamming is NOT okay, and it's against chess.com rules. I want this to be a forum to express your opinion about this, free of spamming and rudeness. Thanks and be polite!
The definition of spamming is this:
"irrelevant or inappropriate messages sent on the internet to a large number of recipients."
Mhm! I love spam! It's tasty!