Chess is boring

Sort:
Avatar of Cobra2721
GabGarbage wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
GabGarbage wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
GabGarbage wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
GabGarbage wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
IdkWhatIDoHerelel wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
Unidentified-GM wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
IdkWhatIDoHerelel wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:

Its only boring cos u are 1600 noob, get gud and it becomes fun

no. When you reach 1600, it's extremely hard to progress. (unless you have talent)

To get to 1750 all u have to do is not blunder

Don't bully them, 1900 noob 😛

Get a rating then u can mock my rating, also what I said was factual

Where'd u got that source bro? from your hairline?

My source is my own journey to 1970.

This dude is still running his mouth about his elo. Nobody cares about that.

Actually I wasnt "running my mouth", merely answering a question

Thanks Sherlock.

If it was so obvious to you, why did you say that I was "running my mouth" in the first place

Just wanna trashtalk on how a mere 1900 elo thinks he is good in rapid.

Please provide proof that I think it is a good rating.

How can you not think fast, skills issue man. Rapid are just for people who take a longer time to think.

You clearly have far below average reading comprehension, as you did not address one thing I mentioned.

Also, rapid is for people who want to play real chess where their moves matter far more than the speed, as at the end of the day, classical FIDE rating is what gets you titles, not blitz.

Try again

Avatar of Reprka
cogadhtintreach wrote:
GabGarbage wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
GabGarbage wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
GabGarbage wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
GabGarbage wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
IdkWhatIDoHerelel wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
Unidentified-GM wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
IdkWhatIDoHerelel wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:

Its only boring cos u are 1600 noob, get gud and it becomes fun

no. When you reach 1600, it's extremely hard to progress. (unless you have talent)

To get to 1750 all u have to do is not blunder

Don't bully them, 1900 noob 😛

Get a rating then u can mock my rating, also what I said was factual

Where'd u got that source bro? from your hairline?

My source is my own journey to 1970.

This dude is still running his mouth about his elo. Nobody cares about that.

Actually I wasnt "running my mouth", merely answering a question

Thanks Sherlock.

If it was so obvious to you, why did you say that I was "running my mouth" in the first place

Just wanna trashtalk on how a mere 1900 elo thinks he is good in rapid.

Please provide proof that I think it is a good rating.

How can you not think fast, skills issue man. Rapid are just for people who take a longer time to think.

You clearly have far below average reading comprehension, as you did not address one thing I mentioned.

Also, rapid is for people who want to play real chess where their moves matter far more than the speed, as at the end of the day, classical FIDE rating is what gets you titles, not blitz.

Try again

Where is your title? Don't see that mate.

Avatar of Cobra2721
GabGarbage wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
GabGarbage wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
GabGarbage wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
GabGarbage wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
GabGarbage wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
IdkWhatIDoHerelel wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
Unidentified-GM wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
IdkWhatIDoHerelel wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:

Its only boring cos u are 1600 noob, get gud and it becomes fun

no. When you reach 1600, it's extremely hard to progress. (unless you have talent)

To get to 1750 all u have to do is not blunder

Don't bully them, 1900 noob 😛

Get a rating then u can mock my rating, also what I said was factual

Where'd u got that source bro? from your hairline?

My source is my own journey to 1970.

This dude is still running his mouth about his elo. Nobody cares about that.

Actually I wasnt "running my mouth", merely answering a question

Thanks Sherlock.

If it was so obvious to you, why did you say that I was "running my mouth" in the first place

Just wanna trashtalk on how a mere 1900 elo thinks he is good in rapid.

Please provide proof that I think it is a good rating.

How can you not think fast, skills issue man. Rapid are just for people who take a longer time to think.

You clearly have far below average reading comprehension, as you did not address one thing I mentioned.

Also, rapid is for people who want to play real chess where their moves matter far more than the speed, as at the end of the day, classical FIDE rating is what gets you titles, not blitz.

Try again

Where is your title? Don't see that mate.

Please provide evidence that I claimed I am titled. I merely said classical is what matters, and I am working towards my goals by playing real chess, as blitz doesnt help improvement.

Try again

Avatar of Reprka
cogadhtintreach wrote:
GabGarbage wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
GabGarbage wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
GabGarbage wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
GabGarbage wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
IdkWhatIDoHerelel wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
Unidentified-GM wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
IdkWhatIDoHerelel wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:

Its only boring cos u are 1600 noob, get gud and it becomes fun

no. When you reach 1600, it's extremely hard to progress. (unless you have talent)

To get to 1750 all u have to do is not blunder

Don't bully them, 1900 noob 😛

Get a rating then u can mock my rating, also what I said was factual

Where'd u got that source bro? from your hairline?

My source is my own journey to 1970.

This dude is still running his mouth about his elo. Nobody cares about that.

Actually I wasnt "running my mouth", merely answering a question

Thanks Sherlock.

If it was so obvious to you, why did you say that I was "running my mouth" in the first place

Just wanna trashtalk on how a mere 1900 elo thinks he is good in rapid.

Please provide proof that I think it is a good rating.

How can you not think fast, skills issue man. Rapid are just for people who take a longer time to think.

You clearly have far below average reading comprehension, as you did not address one thing I mentioned.

Also, rapid is for people who want to play real chess where their moves matter far more than the speed, as at the end of the day, classical FIDE rating is what gets you titles, not blitz.

Try again

Mind specifying on how you aren't even a candidate master at least after talking all that load?

Avatar of Reprka
cogadhtintreach wrote:
GabGarbage wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
GabGarbage wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
GabGarbage wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
GabGarbage wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
GabGarbage wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
IdkWhatIDoHerelel wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
Unidentified-GM wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
IdkWhatIDoHerelel wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:

Its only boring cos u are 1600 noob, get gud and it becomes fun

no. When you reach 1600, it's extremely hard to progress. (unless you have talent)

To get to 1750 all u have to do is not blunder

Don't bully them, 1900 noob 😛

Get a rating then u can mock my rating, also what I said was factual

Where'd u got that source bro? from your hairline?

My source is my own journey to 1970.

This dude is still running his mouth about his elo. Nobody cares about that.

Actually I wasnt "running my mouth", merely answering a question

Thanks Sherlock.

If it was so obvious to you, why did you say that I was "running my mouth" in the first place

Just wanna trashtalk on how a mere 1900 elo thinks he is good in rapid.

Please provide proof that I think it is a good rating.

How can you not think fast, skills issue man. Rapid are just for people who take a longer time to think.

You clearly have far below average reading comprehension, as you did not address one thing I mentioned.

Also, rapid is for people who want to play real chess where their moves matter far more than the speed, as at the end of the day, classical FIDE rating is what gets you titles, not blitz.

Try again

Where is your title? Don't see that mate.

Please provide evidence that I claimed I am titled. I merely said classical is what matters, and I am working towards my goals by playing real chess, as blitz doesnt help improvement.

Try again

😴

Avatar of ryanovster

i suggest checkers for you , if you find chess boring its just too hard for you.

Avatar of Cobra2721
d4iscrazy wrote:

All good players are good at rapid. That's simply the truth (assuming you've played rapid games, ofc).

Some nobody is going to bring up my rapid rating; lol I've played 1 game, and maybe today is the day I start playing rapid (because I don't have time to).

I mean if ur 2100 blitz and 1600 rapid we all know ur true skill lmfao.

One can't compare blitz rating and rapid rating, as they are completely different games.