Its only boring cos u are 1600 noob, get gud and it becomes fun
no. When you reach 1600, it's extremely hard to progress. (unless you have talent)
To get to 1750 all u have to do is not blunder
Don't bully them, 1900 noob 😛
Get a rating then u can mock my rating, also what I said was factual
Where'd u got that source bro? from your hairline?
My source is my own journey to 1970.
This dude is still running his mouth about his elo. Nobody cares about that.
Actually I wasnt "running my mouth", merely answering a question
Thanks Sherlock.
If it was so obvious to you, why did you say that I was "running my mouth" in the first place
Just wanna trashtalk on how a mere 1900 elo thinks he is good in rapid.
Please provide proof that I think it is a good rating.
How can you not think fast, skills issue man. Rapid are just for people who take a longer time to think.
You clearly have far below average reading comprehension, as you did not address one thing I mentioned.
Also, rapid is for people who want to play real chess where their moves matter far more than the speed, as at the end of the day, classical FIDE rating is what gets you titles, not blitz.
Try again
Where is your title? Don't see that mate.
Its only boring cos u are 1600 noob, get gud and it becomes fun
no. When you reach 1600, it's extremely hard to progress. (unless you have talent)
To get to 1750 all u have to do is not blunder
Don't bully them, 1900 noob 😛
Get a rating then u can mock my rating, also what I said was factual
Where'd u got that source bro? from your hairline?
My source is my own journey to 1970.
This dude is still running his mouth about his elo. Nobody cares about that.
Actually I wasnt "running my mouth", merely answering a question
Thanks Sherlock.
If it was so obvious to you, why did you say that I was "running my mouth" in the first place
Just wanna trashtalk on how a mere 1900 elo thinks he is good in rapid.
Please provide proof that I think it is a good rating.
How can you not think fast, skills issue man. Rapid are just for people who take a longer time to think.
You clearly have far below average reading comprehension, as you did not address one thing I mentioned.
Also, rapid is for people who want to play real chess where their moves matter far more than the speed, as at the end of the day, classical FIDE rating is what gets you titles, not blitz.
Try again