My point was that they are all called the "best ever", but if they are all different they cannot all be the "best ever".
OK, but by this logic one could also complain that only one of the 32 chessmen can be best, no?
Of course, since you're making these sets I can understand that you would take exception to my comment - so I apologise for any offence given and I have removed my original comment.
Your humorous intent was not obvious to me. People making people laugh should and must be celebrated. Therefore I apologize for my snappy retort.
My point was that they are all called the "best ever", but if they are all different they cannot all be the "best ever".
OK, but by this logic one could also complain that only one of the 32 chessmen can be best, no?
Of course, since you're making these sets I can understand that you would take exception to my comment - so I apologise for any offence given and I have removed my original comment.
Your humorous intent was not obvious to me. People making people laugh should and must be celebrated. Therefore I apologize for my snappy retort.
-Izmet Fekali