I need to mention something I do not like about this new clock, after playing around with it today between patients.
The clock is kind of big. The Chronos II sits lower and sleeker. During a chess game, especially blitz, I like the "feel" of the Chronos better.
There are larger clocks that have been made. Some of the mechanical clocks were taller and had their buttons sit higher, so a player would need to reach higher to hit the button. The old Saitek digital clock, the one with the little silver buttons on top, reminds me of this larger size.
This new clock also has a bigger footprint than the Chronos II, taking up more room on the table.
Now, I don't think they can do anything about this or even want to do anything. And I imagine that a lot of others would not agree with me that this is a problem at all.
This just makes me want to keep my Chronos II and keep a smaller footprint clock as well for times when they would do better with their smaller sizes.
Of course the price is still a bugaboo. But if it really is a problem in the market, then the producers will be forced to reduce the price if they want to keep it in business.
Huh?
Well, you obviously do not want a genuine conversation regarding the topic of this thread, the clock that I have reviewed.
If you do not want to talk about this new clock, then kindly do not post in this thread.