Danish gambit - crush anyone under 1800 - Chess Forums - Page 4

Chess_Polimac · 2025-08-08T00:17:05-07:00

As a FIDE Trainer, I often hear that the Danish Gambit is "refuted" and not suitable at a high level. But recently, I won a clean attacking game against a 2352-rated player using the Danish — and just today, I played a 3+0 blitz game vs a 2100-rated opponent and again scored a win with t

IM pfren

Aug 19, 2025

0

#61

JayThe10th έγραψε:

pfren wrote:

Chess_Polimac έγραψε:

As I said before you are just amazing

Isn't he!

He's got everything one could ever wish- excluding a real name.

All of your last posts on this forum were insults, none fact.

First of all, @CockroachDolly has mentioned why SHE has an awkward name, with a good explanation.

Secondly, I'd like to mention that your prior posts we're only insulting to other players and never tried to defend or counteract the Danish gambit's claims.

Thirdly, your title as an IM means nothing in this situation. Everyone else here above 2500+ are people who have dedicated their lives to the game of chess. Don't try to use it as leverage.

I admire the solidarity between anonymous trolls.

However, this thing alone is not enough to convince me you are worth an answer.

JayThe10th

Aug 19, 2025

0

#62

pfren wrote:

JayThe10th έγραψε:

pfren wrote:

Chess_Polimac έγραψε:

As I said before you are just amazing

Isn't he!

He's got everything one could ever wish- excluding a real name.

All of your last posts on this forum were insults, none fact.

First of all, @CockroachDolly has mentioned why SHE has an awkward name, with a good explanation.

Secondly, I'd like to mention that your prior posts we're only insulting to other players and never tried to defend or counteract the Danish gambit's claims.

Thirdly, your title as an IM means nothing in this situation. Everyone else here above 2500+ are people who have dedicated their lives to the game of chess. Don't try to use it as leverage.

I admire the solidarity between anonymous trolls.

However, this thing alone is not enough to convince me you are worth an answer.

And another insult.

You know you're only proving my point, right?

apple_pineapple84

Aug 19, 2025

0

#63

JayThe10th wrote:

pfren wrote:

Chess_Polimac έγραψε:

As I said before you are just amazing

Isn't he!

He's got everything one could ever wish- excluding a real name.

All of your last posts on this forum were insults, none fact.

First of all, @CockroachDolly has mentioned why SHE has an awkward name, with a good explanation.

Secondly, I'd like to mention that your prior posts we're only insulting to other players and never tried to defend or counteract the Danish gambit's claims.

Thirdly, your title as an IM means nothing in this situation. Everyone else here above 2500+ are people who have dedicated their lives to the game of chess. Don't try to use it as leverage.

You're not...2500

apple_pineapple84

Aug 19, 2025

0

#64

@CockroachDolly is right,the Danish is bad.But OP said it works for people under 1800.And since most of this site is U1800...

JayThe10th

Aug 26, 2025

0

#65

apple_pineapple84 wrote:

JayThe10th wrote:

pfren wrote:

Chess_Polimac έγραψε:

As I said before you are just amazing

Isn't he!

He's got everything one could ever wish- excluding a real name.

All of your last posts on this forum were insults, none fact.

First of all, @CockroachDolly has mentioned why SHE has an awkward name, with a good explanation.

Secondly, I'd like to mention that your prior posts we're only insulting to other players and never tried to defend or counteract the Danish gambit's claims.

Thirdly, your title as an IM means nothing in this situation. Everyone else here above 2500+ are people who have dedicated their lives to the game of chess. Don't try to use it as leverage.

You're not...2500

Yes, but my reason for mentioning it is that others on the forum have said that his title as an IM means he has dedicated his life to chess more than someone like @CockroachDolly

CockroachGirly

Aug 26, 2025

0

#66

pfren wrote:

JayThe10th έγραψε:

pfren wrote:

Chess_Polimac έγραψε:

As I said before you are just amazing

Isn't he!

He's got everything one could ever wish- excluding a real name.

All of your last posts on this forum were insults, none fact.

First of all, @CockroachDolly has mentioned why SHE has an awkward name, with a good explanation.

Secondly, I'd like to mention that your prior posts we're only insulting to other players and never tried to defend or counteract the Danish gambit's claims.

Thirdly, your title as an IM means nothing in this situation. Everyone else here above 2500+ are people who have dedicated their lives to the game of chess. Don't try to use it as leverage.

I admire the solidarity between anonymous trolls.

However, this thing alone is not enough to convince me you are worth an answer.

Impressive. An 85 year old IM who’s mastered the art of recycling the same three canned lines over and over again. “troll,” “not worth an answer,” and “anonymous.” At this rate, you’ll fossilize before you ever come up with an original thought.

Sipunzyaka

Aug 28, 2025

0

#67

Is the Göring Gambit also bad then?

umbravolt

Aug 28, 2025

0

#68

Sipunzyaka wrote:

Is the Göring Gambit also bad then?

No

JETINATE

Aug 30, 2025

0

#69

Let me put an end to this arguement. I think the Danish is really strong to beat beginners and intermediates, but above that it is hard to pull off. I think the Danish is really good but against stronger players it is not so good. That is what I think anyway.