Open Chess Lessons

Here is one of the most instructive moments of my lessons from this week

White to move, what would you play here?

A) 1.Nxd5?: as you will easily see the isolated doubled pawn of black is a big weakness and black will have issues keeping the material sufficiently defended

B) 1.Bd2: in my opinion the most principled move, making sure that white will maintain the bishop, while also making sure that the Nc3 is defended by a pawn

C) 1.Ne4: an interesting move, that highlights white's structural superiority. White will improve his pieces and put pressure on the weak isolated doubled pawns.

D) 1.0-0: continuing development and allowing doubled pawns on the c-file (after Nxc3), white's structure will be much better than black's, because the pawns are neither isolated, nor easily attackable.

Trying to improve your game and taking the next step? Then contact me and schedule your first training!

Neither of these. Bg5 is the way.

Simplify, move towards an endgame, or reposition your bishop to g3. All the other choices you provided are average or below average

Why should losing control over f4 be good?

Losing control over f4? Ummm..that's not even an isolated square. Just g3 lol

this weakens white's capability to diminish black's counterplay on the f-file and creates additional weaknesses on the white squares around the king.

no idea what this psuedo chess jargon you wrote here even meant, but I'm struggling to process that sentence grammatically. U are overanalyzing a position that doesn’t even need analysis. Bg5. Trade, play against the doubled pawns. g3 takes care of a black piece that invades on f4. Ur scared of non-existent threats

Your ad hominems were very negatively taken in other posts. Please stop being disrespectful Praveen Sagar.

Intent was not trying to be rude and sorry for the way it came out earlier. The sentence you made was indeed difficult to interpret. But let me try to give another version of a clean and more respectful analysis.

There are many playable moves in this position. Nxd5 definitely being the worst of them since it essentially repairs black's pawn structure. In general (without going by the engine's analysis) the most instinctive move a strong player would try to play here is Bg5, with the idea of inviting a trade of bishops and entering into an easy endgame where black's pawn structure is a complete mess. I now checked the position with an engine, and the engine belives that the best move is to retreat the bishop to d2. While this move, is solid enough too - the problem is that engines have certain flaw in the way the process plans differently from humans. A human plan here is to quickly transition into an endgame. In terms of the f4 square, not really an issue because g3 kicks a piece out that lands on that square. The absence of the light squared bishop from black, so indicate that there's very little to worry about in terms of potential "colour weakness" issues.

Hope this analysis highlights the key thought processes here

To add to the analysis. After Bg5, if black plays Qd7, the goal is to quickly reposition the bishop to g3 and maintain pressure against black's e5 pawn

C) Ne4? Centralising Knight. Keeps e5 from progressing

Ne4 is good, Bd2 and 0-0 are good too. Only Nxd5 is not good.

Interesting concepts you had here

Thank you

Ne4

What is the objective evaluation of this position?
Would you continue playing this position?

Objective: to promote e-pawn, exchange Rooks?

To continue: I’m undecided on activating K to f-file or pushing f-pawn with King behind a wall of pawns?

Kf3 or f3?

The objective evaluation is that the position is equal. Black will activate his rook and in most cases avoid the exchange of rooks.

I thought that after f4, putting the White rook on the 3rd rank and then going Kf3, e4 and g4 might offer black chances to go wrong.