What situation that worth sacrificing Castling?

Sort:
Avatar of StellaSono
Everytime I play, I tend to secure my king to castling before my opponent destroyed it. I just watched some games that didn’t attempt to escape from the opponent attack on Castling, but somehow the player still wins or at least remises. I started to wonder in what condition that sacrificing castling is actually advantageous and not blunder?
Avatar of tygxc

@1
"in what condition that sacrificing castling is actually advantageous and not blunder?"
++ Castling gains 2 tempi, as it is 3 moves Kf2, Rf1, Kg1 for the price of 1.
Thus if you can gain 2 tempi or a pawn, it is worth losing castling.
Four examples:
https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1228244

https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1228294

https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1255422

https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1044179 

Avatar of Risk-It

I really don't know!

Avatar of JustMonika_0922
Don’t ask us. Ask Magnus.
Avatar of ChessMasteryOfficial

If you can win material (e.g., a piece, several pawns) or achieve a significant tactical advantage by delaying or forgoing castling, it can be worth it.