Given that the statement in question is at the end of a very long paragraph, which your students probably aren't going to bother reading, I don't think it much matters. They're just going to click that "Free Move" button and move on. You're right of course though that in the author's enthusiasm for teaching the exchange variation, he plays fast and loose with the facts. Chances of it being corrected ? Not good. At least not until the current V3 crisis is resolved.
The good news is that CM errors are pretty rare, at least in the newer courses, although I certainly haven't tried them all. Good catch though.
The lesson, "Essentials of Opening Play" contains an error concerning the Ruy Lopez. It states, While 4.Ba4 is a good move, 4.Bxc6 is more common and is also very strong.
This assertion is wrong. Not only is 4.Ba4 vastly more common, it is generally considered a better move. It certainly scores better for White (see image below).
The Exchange variation, which is advocated in the lesson, has its merits, but it is not the most popular, as stated. It also is not the best variation for teaching the concept of the opening.
I was reviewing lessons for beginning players because some of my students have asked about Chess Mentor. Do I need to tell them to steer clear of the courses on openings?