Future of chess

Sort:
KetoOn1963
musketeerchess2017 wrote:
Whiskermatt wrote:

Teaching statistics!  

Hi

the chess future are chess variants.

 

take a look at musketeer chess, still chess but much better.

 

wwe.musketeerchess.net

 

Have to disagree.  Chess will never be solved by humans.  So why create different forms of chess?  i would rather keep learning new things in the classic game.

SupernovaUK
musketeerchess2017 wrote:
SupernovaUK wrote:
musketeerchess2017 wrote:
Whiskermatt wrote:

Teaching statistics!  

Hi

the chess future are chess variants.

 

take a look at musketeer chess, still chess but much better.

 

wwe.musketeerchess.net

 

Blatantly not true. Although looking at your profile I see you have good reason to try and portray 'musketeer chess' as astoundingly fun!

Each one has the right to defend his ideas. What is your rating? I used to be National Master

I'm just saying you clearly are self-promoting. And I struggle to see rating's relevancy here

magnusshields

Its about having the right chess variant. The current game was chess variant anyway, but modern chess is nearly a perfect game in its current form. That is why it is so hard to make a better variant chess then the current chess game. I believe there will be a time in the future when we have such a variant but the current ones are not good enough.

ndazone
The future of chess is everyone is named the winner. Hey, it is the trend everywhere else.
Nordlandia

It can seem monotonous to dedicate your entire chess life to regular chess. Why so hesitant about variants folks. It's like never leaving New York City or London.

Of course people have the capacity to learn other variants but it seems that are not prioritized.

Take for example Seirawan Chess (S-Chess) or Capablanca Chess. New pieces add some refreshment to the game. Classical chess is always the same within the rules.