1.d4 is boring

Sort:
Avatar of GMD4_KING

And even if it is you should be ready to face boring positions and equal positions you r not gonna smash someone in the opening at a respected level

Avatar of keep1teasy

It's probably boring/annoying because you don't understand the positional nuances. 

For example, me, I find a traditional slav/semi-slav defense very "boring" (yes I do) because I don't understand the reasoning and positional ideas behind a lot of moves.

For example in many slav lines, black plays Bg4, and white can play h3+g4, and it's just very strange. I don't understand it much. So I refrain from playing those openings.

I also enjoy playing positions that many people would consider boring, such as exchange kid/philidor kind of structures. I find those very fun, but a lot of people don't.

But if you think d4 is boring, from the black side, you are probably just don't appreciate your current opening, or you haven't found your thing yet.

Against the london, one can try 1.d4 Nf6 2.Bf4 b5!? or a worse off line like 1.d4 Nf6 2.Bf4 Nh5!? If you play 1...d5 against d4, you can try an early f6 line that levy (gothamchess) recommends. 

Avatar of Kowarenai

it is but eh thats why its soooo good and respected as an opening at the top, its just super solid and strong that you have to grind for over 50 moves for even a tiny advantage to win

Avatar of keep1teasy
Kowarenai wrote:

it is but eh thats why its soooo good and respected as an opening at the top, its just super solid and strong that you have to grind for over 50 moves for even a tiny advantage to win

Not really, it's quite easy to get a positional advantage against someone who forgets even one aspect of the positional nuances. 

 

Avatar of Kowarenai
B1ZMARK wrote:
Kowarenai wrote:

it is but eh thats why its soooo good and respected as an opening at the top, its just super solid and strong that you have to grind for over 50 moves for even a tiny advantage to win

Not really, it's quite easy to get a positional advantage against someone who forgets even one aspect of the positional nuances. 

 

thats kinda a bad example, i am meaning in general lets say idk around our range its harder to make any type of special progress with black to gain a win

Avatar of EKAFC

D4 is a great opening but only if they play a Queen's Gambit or one of those 2.Nf3 setups. And that is according to Chess Coach Andras. As a 1.d4 player, I hate other d4 players who play the London, the Colle, the Veresov, or any other boring setup just to play the same moves against anything

Avatar of JustBeatsy

I quite like d4 leading to Colle variant openings, which I've recently taken a shine to. Definitely a relaxing way to open, so I guess it IS boring in that sense, but I like it. I can get nicely developed to a (now) more familiar position going into the midgame almost regardless of what black does. I say "almost regardless" cos Fritz 18 goes bonkers with the black queen on any non-noob level setting and spoils everything sad.png 

I'll persevere with it for now though...

Avatar of marqumax
It leads to slightly more closed positions first but when they open it gets really exciting. I can name hundreds of lines which lead to exciting positions. Let me know if you want more. I can give many in any opening: queen's gambit, king's indian... ANYTHING just say which one and I'll give you an exciting line.
 
Here's one of hundreds of these examples from the grunfeld:
 

 

Avatar of programador510

try e3

Avatar of randomchessplayer1224

1.e4!!

Avatar of Optimissed
villetaylor wrote:

I find d4 "boring"

How extremely interesting.

Avatar of Optimissed
Kowarenai wrote:

it is but eh thats why its soooo good and respected as an opening at the top, its just super solid and strong that you have to grind for over 50 moves for even a tiny advantage to win

I find that wins usually come quicker with 1. d4 than with 1. e4.

Avatar of Optimissed


Just played this 1.d4 opening.
Avatar of swarminglocusts
Brah play Nf3 and d4 when you are ready or c4 and d4 for a pawn break if c5 is played.
Avatar of LarsVDMnl
Laskersnephew wrote:

If you want to get a good night's sleep, look at the boring 1.d4 games played by Marshall, Alekhine, Kasparov, Shirov, Spassky, Keres, Stein, and Anand. What a snoozefest

d4 is more exciting than the overused italian and spanish games. d4 often leads to more open and attacking games than e4.

Avatar of -BEES-

No such thing as boring openings. Only boring players.

Avatar of Optimissed

Logically that can't be right.

Avatar of DimiBell
I agree
Avatar of c4_Strike

Try g4 then.

Avatar of Optimissed
DrSpudnik wrote:
Jai4chess wrote:

Gioco Pianissimo is not very appealing to me either, but never played that

I know what you mean. I play 3. Bc4 all the time but I'll be damned if I'll follow up with d3! I mean, why bother!?! If I wanted to squiggle around in a positional mess, I'd play the Ruy.

c3 or 0-0 if ...Bc5 or d4 if  ...Nf6, as I recall