Forums

1.e4, d5

Sort:
Avatar of ThrillerFan
ThrillerFan
Oct 18, 2018
0
#21
OpeningTheorist wrote:
ThrillerFan wrote:
OpeningTheorist wrote:
pfren wrote:

2.exd5 is the one and only move worth consideration.

I don't know, the Williams Gambit of the Bird (2.c4) seems great to me 

 

Hmmmm....and a 1400 player seems weak to me!

Pfren is right, as he is 98 percent of the time (as a guru of the French Defense, I beg to differ with a few of his assessments in that department, but otherwise, I guarantee you he knows light years more than me in any other opening, and people that know me know that I specialize in openings not named the Grunfeld or Dragon along with Endgames - weakness being the Middlegame, but I digress ...).

 

Now you have an IM telling you that 2.exd5 is the only move, an expert telling you 2.exd5 is the only move, and a 1400 telling you to play 2.c4.

 

Hmmmmmmm......

Sorry I didn't knew you have autism as you it was clearly sarcasm

 

Alright smarta$$!  Now you think you can start giving medical diagnosises?  Sarcasm is not obvious in written form without some kind of smiley icon displaying some kind if smirk-type look.

So why don't you go take your illegal medical advice that you ought to be arrested for and shove it where the sun don't shine!  And for the record, I don't have autism, but I have a nephew with Down Syndrome and joking around about neurological issues is something that would only be done by someone who was dropped on the head by mom in the bathroom at birth!

Avatar of OpeningTheorist
OpeningTheorist
Oct 18, 2018
0
#22
ThrillerFan wrote:
OpeningTheorist wrote:
ThrillerFan wrote:
OpeningTheorist wrote:
pfren wrote:

2.exd5 is the one and only move worth consideration.

I don't know, the Williams Gambit of the Bird (2.c4) seems great to me 

 

Hmmmm....and a 1400 player seems weak to me!

Pfren is right, as he is 98 percent of the time (as a guru of the French Defense, I beg to differ with a few of his assessments in that department, but otherwise, I guarantee you he knows light years more than me in any other opening, and people that know me know that I specialize in openings not named the Grunfeld or Dragon along with Endgames - weakness being the Middlegame, but I digress ...).

 

Now you have an IM telling you that 2.exd5 is the only move, an expert telling you 2.exd5 is the only move, and a 1400 telling you to play 2.c4.

 

Hmmmmmmm......

Sorry I didn't knew you have autism as you it was clearly sarcasm

 

Alright smarta$$!  Now you think you can start giving medical diagnosises?  Sarcasm is not obvious in written form without some kind of smiley icon displaying some kind if smirk-type look.

So why don't you go take your illegal medical advice that you ought to be arrested for and shove it where the sun don't shine!  And for the record, I don't have autism, but I have a nephew with Down Syndrome and joking around about neurological issues is something that would only be done by someone who was dropped on the head by mom in the bathroom at birth!

Wow you are so salty. I didn't know for sure if you are autist... after this reply I know for sure!

Avatar of ThrillerFan
ThrillerFan
Oct 18, 2018
0
#23
OpeningTheorist wrote:
ThrillerFan wrote:
OpeningTheorist wrote:
ThrillerFan wrote:
OpeningTheorist wrote:
pfren wrote:

2.exd5 is the one and only move worth consideration.

I don't know, the Williams Gambit of the Bird (2.c4) seems great to me 

 

Hmmmm....and a 1400 player seems weak to me!

Pfren is right, as he is 98 percent of the time (as a guru of the French Defense, I beg to differ with a few of his assessments in that department, but otherwise, I guarantee you he knows light years more than me in any other opening, and people that know me know that I specialize in openings not named the Grunfeld or Dragon along with Endgames - weakness being the Middlegame, but I digress ...).

 

Now you have an IM telling you that 2.exd5 is the only move, an expert telling you 2.exd5 is the only move, and a 1400 telling you to play 2.c4.

 

Hmmmmmmm......

Sorry I didn't knew you have autism as you it was clearly sarcasm

 

Alright smarta$$!  Now you think you can start giving medical diagnosises?  Sarcasm is not obvious in written form without some kind of smiley icon displaying some kind if smirk-type look.

So why don't you go take your illegal medical advice that you ought to be arrested for and shove it where the sun don't shine!  And for the record, I don't have autism, but I have a nephew with Down Syndrome and joking around about neurological issues is something that would only be done by someone who was dropped on the head by mom in the bathroom at birth!

Wow you are so salty. I didn't know for sure if you are autist... after this reply I know for sure!

 

Clearly you know nothing and are a total disgrace to chess.com forums!

Avatar of OpeningTheorist
OpeningTheorist
Oct 18, 2018
0
#24
ThrillerFan wrote:
OpeningTheorist wrote:
ThrillerFan wrote:
OpeningTheorist wrote:
ThrillerFan wrote:
OpeningTheorist wrote:
pfren wrote:

2.exd5 is the one and only move worth consideration.

I don't know, the Williams Gambit of the Bird (2.c4) seems great to me 

 

Hmmmm....and a 1400 player seems weak to me!

Pfren is right, as he is 98 percent of the time (as a guru of the French Defense, I beg to differ with a few of his assessments in that department, but otherwise, I guarantee you he knows light years more than me in any other opening, and people that know me know that I specialize in openings not named the Grunfeld or Dragon along with Endgames - weakness being the Middlegame, but I digress ...).

 

Now you have an IM telling you that 2.exd5 is the only move, an expert telling you 2.exd5 is the only move, and a 1400 telling you to play 2.c4.

 

Hmmmmmmm......

Sorry I didn't knew you have autism as you it was clearly sarcasm

 

Alright smarta$$!  Now you think you can start giving medical diagnosises?  Sarcasm is not obvious in written form without some kind of smiley icon displaying some kind if smirk-type look.

So why don't you go take your illegal medical advice that you ought to be arrested for and shove it where the sun don't shine!  And for the record, I don't have autism, but I have a nephew with Down Syndrome and joking around about neurological issues is something that would only be done by someone who was dropped on the head by mom in the bathroom at birth!

Wow you are so salty. I didn't know for sure if you are autist... after this reply I know for sure!

 

Clearly you know nothing and are a total disgrace to chess.com forums!

You know that typing a "!" after each phrase doesn't make you look less salty right? 

I don't know if you are austist but dude I sarcastically comment a pfren's comment and you start typing bullshit to me? lol man you weren't even involved.

Avatar of ThrillerFan
ThrillerFan
Oct 18, 2018
0
#25
OpeningTheorist wrote:
ThrillerFan wrote:
OpeningTheorist wrote:
ThrillerFan wrote:
OpeningTheorist wrote:
ThrillerFan wrote:
OpeningTheorist wrote:
pfren wrote:

2.exd5 is the one and only move worth consideration.

I don't know, the Williams Gambit of the Bird (2.c4) seems great to me 

 

Hmmmm....and a 1400 player seems weak to me!

Pfren is right, as he is 98 percent of the time (as a guru of the French Defense, I beg to differ with a few of his assessments in that department, but otherwise, I guarantee you he knows light years more than me in any other opening, and people that know me know that I specialize in openings not named the Grunfeld or Dragon along with Endgames - weakness being the Middlegame, but I digress ...).

 

Now you have an IM telling you that 2.exd5 is the only move, an expert telling you 2.exd5 is the only move, and a 1400 telling you to play 2.c4.

 

Hmmmmmmm......

Sorry I didn't knew you have autism as you it was clearly sarcasm

 

Alright smarta$$!  Now you think you can start giving medical diagnosises?  Sarcasm is not obvious in written form without some kind of smiley icon displaying some kind if smirk-type look.

So why don't you go take your illegal medical advice that you ought to be arrested for and shove it where the sun don't shine!  And for the record, I don't have autism, but I have a nephew with Down Syndrome and joking around about neurological issues is something that would only be done by someone who was dropped on the head by mom in the bathroom at birth!

Wow you are so salty. I didn't know for sure if you are autist... after this reply I know for sure!

 

Clearly you know nothing and are a total disgrace to chess.com forums!

You know that typing a "!" after each phrase doesn't make you look less salty right? 

I don't know if you are austist but dude I sarcastically comment a pfren's comment and you start typing bullshit to me? lol man you weren't even involved.

 

Thus is an open forum, clown, not a private conversation.  You want a private conversation with pfren, there is this nice wonderful thing called a private message, but, of course, that technology is too far advanced for you.  Email?  Twitter?  Facebook?  Instagram?  Snapchat?  Probably all foreign to you.  Looking at your pic, you probably barely understand what a telephone is used for.  Shoot!  You don't even know the difference between 1.Nf3 and 1.Nh3 that you actually had to ask (even sarcastically) whether 1.Nh3 was just as good.  Your snide and sarcastic bullsh*t is not useful at all to beginners in the chess community and while others try to help beginners by giving them the message that 2.exd5 is the only good move to 1...d5, which it is, all your BS does is confuse them.  So once again, take that useless old body of yours and harass those that are trying to explain tic tac toe strategy.  Your info is useless here.  They have an off-topic section for your baloney if you really have to post such garbage just to feel like you are useful part of the chess society despite the fact that you are a bug and the rest of us are windshields!

Avatar of OpeningTheorist
OpeningTheorist
Oct 18, 2018
0
#26
ThrillerFan wrote:
OpeningTheorist wrote:
ThrillerFan wrote:
OpeningTheorist wrote:
ThrillerFan wrote:
OpeningTheorist wrote:
ThrillerFan wrote:
OpeningTheorist wrote:
pfren wrote:

2.exd5 is the one and only move worth consideration.

I don't know, the Williams Gambit of the Bird (2.c4) seems great to me 

 

Hmmmm....and a 1400 player seems weak to me!

Pfren is right, as he is 98 percent of the time (as a guru of the French Defense, I beg to differ with a few of his assessments in that department, but otherwise, I guarantee you he knows light years more than me in any other opening, and people that know me know that I specialize in openings not named the Grunfeld or Dragon along with Endgames - weakness being the Middlegame, but I digress ...).

 

Now you have an IM telling you that 2.exd5 is the only move, an expert telling you 2.exd5 is the only move, and a 1400 telling you to play 2.c4.

 

Hmmmmmmm......

Sorry I didn't knew you have autism as you it was clearly sarcasm

 

Alright smarta$$!  Now you think you can start giving medical diagnosises?  Sarcasm is not obvious in written form without some kind of smiley icon displaying some kind if smirk-type look.

So why don't you go take your illegal medical advice that you ought to be arrested for and shove it where the sun don't shine!  And for the record, I don't have autism, but I have a nephew with Down Syndrome and joking around about neurological issues is something that would only be done by someone who was dropped on the head by mom in the bathroom at birth!

Wow you are so salty. I didn't know for sure if you are autist... after this reply I know for sure!

 

Clearly you know nothing and are a total disgrace to chess.com forums!

You know that typing a "!" after each phrase doesn't make you look less salty right? 

I don't know if you are austist but dude I sarcastically comment a pfren's comment and you start typing bullshit to me? lol man you weren't even involved.

 

Thus is an open forum, clown, not a private conversation.  You want a private conversation with pfren, there is this nice wonderful thing called a private message, but, of course, that technology is too far advanced for you.  Email?  Twitter?  Facebook?  Instagram?  Snapchat?  Probably all foreign to you.  Looking at your pic, you probably barely understand what a telephone is used for.  Shoot!  You don't even know the difference between 1.Nf3 and 1.Nh3 that you actually had to ask (even sarcastically) whether 1.Nh3 was just as good.  Your snide and sarcastic bullsh*t is not useful at all to beginners in the chess community and while others try to help beginners by giving them the message that 2.exd5 is the only good move to 1...d5, which it is, all your BS does is confuse them.  So once again, take that useless old body of yours and harass those that are trying to explain tic tac toe strategy.  Your info is useless here.  They have an off-topic section for your baloney if you really have to post such garbage just to feel like you are useful part of the chess society despite the fact that you are a bug and the rest of us are windshields!

Ok you reached the reportable level of saltyness.

Pd: The guy on my profile pic is not me, it's Garry Kasparov.