if there are too few games, what does that tell you?
it means it sucks
1.e4 is over-rated
Sort:
thunder_tiger123 wrote:
if there are too few games, what does that tell you?
it means it sucks
It means not enough player tried it
Friendly-User wrote:
thunder_tiger123 wrote:
if there are too few games, what does that tell you?
it means it sucks
It means not enough player tried it
and who would try a bad opening
I sent you a challenge in online chess.
thunder_tiger123 wrote:
I sent you a challenge in online chess.
ok
already up a pawn
You play 1.e4. I play 1. d4. It's drawn by agreement by 3 fold repetition. Thanks.
Noobish Opening.. check
Noobish Mindings.. check
Noobish Play.. check
Noobish Rank.. check
Noobish Man.. check
Pls.. dont post anymore if your that NOOB because your just wasting your time.. I know your weak but plss.. STOP POSTING NONSENSICAL POSTS
thunder_tiger123 wrote:
already up a pawn
I still have the better position
thunder_tiger123 wrote:
already up a pawn
ALREADY UP A QUEEN !!!!
hahaha 8...Qc5 then followed by 9..0-0 give black the advantage what a funny game this is. hahha.now here in this game black loses a queen.lol
proof that 1.e4 is absolutely the best move
e4 is best by test ~ Bobby Fischer
F3 seems interesting but if you do a little research:
- Taking away most natural place for the knight on g1 to develop
- You don't think the kingside weakness is bad by pushing your f pawn like that? It seems like a reversed damiano defence and damiano defence already has a horrible reputation, can't imagine getting a lot better if you play it with white.
- On move 1 you don't occupy the centre, not necessarily bad but why not d3 - e4 instead of f3 - e4? This way the centre control is a lot stronger for white without big weaknesses. If you play king's gambit, you can use your f pawn or with the dutch defense, otherwise leave it at home!
I just messed up. it had nothing to do with the opening. after this game lets play a rematch
thunder_tiger123 wrote:
I just messed up. it had nothing to do with the opening. after this game lets play a rematch
My pieces were more active after the opening = the reason why you lost your queen.That proves f3 is a good opening and that you are bad at chess(so you should stop talking about openings)
reineirpogi19 wrote:
Noobish Opening.. check
Noobish Mindings.. check
Noobish Play.. check
Noobish Rank.. check
Noobish Man.. check
Pls.. dont post anymore if your that NOOB because your just wasting your time.. I know your weak but plss.. STOP POSTING NONSENSICAL POSTS
Actually, it turns out that he should keep posting.
Friendly-User wrote:
thunder_tiger123 wrote:
I just messed up. it had nothing to do with the opening. after this game lets play a rematch
My pieces were more active after the opening = the reason why you lost your queen.That proves f3 is a good opening and that you are bad at chess(so you should stop talking about openings)
my otb is 1806, and I don't play 1 e5
f3 is passive and not so good.
1) the dark squares become weak and the e1-h4 and g1-a7 diagonals is also weak.
2) Ng1 cant go to its natural f3 square.
3. It is passive.
4. You spend a tempo and give black the opening advantage of a tempo!
5. look at the stats: http://www.365chess.com/opening.php?m=4&n=405&ms=f3.e5.e4&ns=507.1603.405
1)you have dark square bishop to cover those weaknesses.Also black can't attack that early in the game so your "weak diagonals" mean nothing
2)there is no natural square for the knight.Like I said,you move your knight to e2 to prepare a d4 or f4 push.Later in the game you might bring your knight to d4 or f4(that's much better than f3)
3)it's not passive,it makes e4 more solid,resulting in a small but powerful pawn chain
4)It makes e4 more solid,that's not a waste from my perspective
5)there are too few games played with this opening,making those statistics irrelevant