White: Carlsen Black: the OP 1.e4 c5 2.Bc4 care to place so bets on the outcome?
No need to bet. Guaranteed win for white. Now, if I were to play Carlsen, I wouldn't want to play a Sicilian. I would go down in flames with something much closer to my style. Also, yes, I was expecting the fallacy ad Carlsen (aka, fallacy of the GM) in defence of 2.Bc4 
After 1.e4 c5 2.Bc4 the better player will win! What's wrong with that?
After 1.e4 c5 2.Bc4 the better player will win! What's wrong with that?
It's just not attractive. It's meh. I don't need meh chess in my life, do you?
That's the kind of insightful chess analysis that keeps me coming back to chess.com!
White: Carlsen Black: the OP 1.e4 c5 2.Bc4 care to place so bets on the outcome?