All opening possible for white

3 problems:
1) Chess.com's labelling of openings are highly inaccurate.
2) Many openings are not determined by 1 move. For example, 1.Nf3 is NOT the Reti Opening. It has no name yet. The Reti Opening is specifically 1.Nf3 d5 2.c4 (or many transpositions to that where specifically Black has played d5, White has played Nf3 and c4, and White has not played d4. For example, 1.c4 Nf6 2.Nf3 e6 3.g3 d5 4.Bg2 Be7 would be a Reti Opening, despite White not having played 1.Nf3. Same goes for the Van Geet Opening. It is a specific line after 1.Nc3, like 1.Nc3 d5 2.d4 is not the Van Geet, it's the Veresov if 2...Nf6 3.Bg5, and the Jobava Attack if 3.Bf4. The Van Geet is actually 1.Nc3 d5 2.e4 d4, specifically! 1.b3 is not the Nimzo-Larsen Attack. 1.b3 is Larsen's Opening (which can transpose to the Nimzowitsch Attack, especially if Black doesn't play 1...e5), while the nimzowitsch Attack is 1.Nf3 followed by 2.b3.
3) Whoop-di-bleeping-doo-dah - What is your point??? Bring up something useful to discuss!
Ware opening | 1.a4
Nimzowitsch-Larsen attack | 1.b3
Polish opening | 1.b4
Saragossa opening | 1.c3
English opening | 1.c4
Mieses opening | 1.d3
Queen’s pawn opening | 1.d4
Van’t Kruijs opening | 1.e3
King’s pawn opening | 1.e4
Barnes opening | 1.f3
Bird’s opening | 1.f4
King’s Fianchetto opening | 1.g3
Grob opening | 1.g4
Clemenz opening | 1.h3
Kádas opening | 1.h4
Sodium attack | 1.Na3
Van Geet opening | 1.Nc3
Réti opening | 1.Nf3
Amar opening | 1.Nh3