https://lichess.org/@/Lvarro look at my lichess games, I literally don't about the froms gambit I play e4 and act like I was playing the kings gambit all along.
Any thoughts on the Bird's Opening?


Guys i played all life against d4 d5 and then transpose in to slav, dutch,queens gambit declined and chigorin, should i try nimzo indian and other Nf6 opening and what would you suggest ?

As i wrote in an similar forum.
Its bad wheter you play 1, e5 or prepare e5 with d6, f6 Nh6;Nf7,Bg7.
Dont let them play an comfortable white stonewall. And is say that as an player who played the black stonewall often
So we should play the From’s Gambit? Could you elaborate?

As i wrote in an similar forum.
Its bad wheter you play 1, e5 or prepare e5 with d6, f6 Nh6;Nf7,Bg7.
Dont let them play an comfortable white stonewall. And is say that as an player who played the black stonewall often
It seems like Stonewall has the capacity to intimidate some players. Do you find that to be the case?

As i wrote in an similar forum.
Its bad wheter you play 1, e5 or prepare e5 with d6, f6 Nh6;Nf7,Bg7.
Dont let them play an comfortable white stonewall. And is say that as an player who played the black stonewall often
The Stoneawll defence works well when white has already committed his light-squared bishop at g2.
This is not the case with the Stonewall attack where Blacxk hasn't committed himself yet because of white's extra tempo.
The Stonewall attack is a crap opening, and everyone should gladly invite it/ hope for it.
1.f4 is a decent move, but with something like a reversed Leningrad Dutch in mind, not a Stonewall.

https://youtube.com/channel/UCHnGMZFc9psJnfHoYFYgg6g

I've won both of the games that I've played this, something about weird openings