caro
As an e4 player, what do you hate to play against

you can change it up with 2. Nc3 and play the Ginsburg (Four knights ...a3) or vienna game (3..f4)

"hypermodern" pawn pushing "trench weasels"
pirc
modern
french (not so much with the monte carlo, but tricky sidelines and declines)
king's gambit 2...d6 deferred fisher & ESPECIALLY 2...Nc6 which i'm 2:7, but I eat the REGULAR fisher & mc cleod up like snacks. I thought about creating a thread asking WHY I win almost every mac cleod, and loose almost every queen's knight. i got hosed the other day by 3...f5!?
carokann - but maybe i need to study the hillbilly as i won one without study.
alekhine - because the krejcik isn't the strongest reply, but i like it as a king's gambiteer
nimzowitsch - i used to get beat badly by -200s in it. i get tripped up positionally super easy

anything but 1.f5
never seen the duras gambit. i'm getting it confused with the latvian gambit which is HIDEOUS for black. now see, I used to play that, but it's SUPER UNSOUND! it gets quick surprise wins, but is hideous
hmm... maybe i want to study THAT instead of trying to cobble a fritz/schliemann repertoire with mind numbing transpositions. the duras has winning stats under 2000. as a king's gambit player, i might get along with it better than positional scandinavians... particularly moderns & the advance. i'm not a sicilian guy, but i like 2...e5 better than 2...Bf5 which was 1/2 of the reson i stopped playing a decade ago.
hmmm... the duras. thanks for the homework.
i like variations that sidestep like meeting the scandinavian with the blackmar diemer gambit.
NOPE! NEVER MIND. i hate giving my castle up more than i love stealing them. it looks like a fugly staunton gambit which drives me nuts in the stonewall
if I become a duras player, tanks in advance, even if it undoes all of my fritz/schliemann research.

"hypermodern" pawn pushing "trench weasels"
pirc
modern
french (not so much with the monte carlo, but tricky sidelines and declines)
king's gambit 2...d6 deferred fisher & ESPECIALLY 2...Nc6 which i'm 2:7, but I eat the REGULAR fisher & mc cleod up like snacks. I thought about creating a thread asking WHY I win almost every mac cleod, and loose almost every queen's knight. i got hosed the other day by 3...f5!?
carokann - but maybe i need to study the hillbilly as i won one without study.
alekhine - because the krejcik isn't the strongest reply, but i like it as a king's gambiteer
nimzowitsch - i used to get beat badly by -200s in it. i get tripped up positionally super easy
More of the pawn pushing hypermodern stuff I hate. the first one.
also. DO NOT play the hillbilly caro. its not good.

just play 2.nf3 then?
You wanna hear something hilarious? I never thought to just do this.
I used to play 1…Nc6 (and I still do, for surprise value) and 2.Nf3 is the most challenging line (because black will never transpose into a double king pawn opening)
join me in reviving the old steinitz defense brotha!

just play 2.nf3 then?
You wanna hear something hilarious? I never thought to just do this.
I used to play 1…Nc6 (and I still do, for surprise value) and 2.Nf3 is the most challenging line (because black will never transpose into a double king pawn opening)
join me in reviving the old steinitz defense brotha!
the one against the ruy lopez?

d4 kills 1. Nc6
if everyone played 2.d4 against 1...Nc6 I wouldn't be playing the sicilian

just play 2.nf3 then?
You wanna hear something hilarious? I never thought to just do this.
I used to play 1…Nc6 (and I still do, for surprise value) and 2.Nf3 is the most challenging line (because black will never transpose into a double king pawn opening)
join me in reviving the old steinitz defense brotha!
the one against the ruy lopez?
yeah, Ruy lopez old steinitz defense, pepperidge farms remembers!
just play 2.nf3 then?
You wanna hear something hilarious? I never thought to just do this.
I used to play 1…Nc6 (and I still do, for surprise value) and 2.Nf3 is the most challenging line (because black will never transpose into a double king pawn opening)