Bb5 Sacrifice

Sort:
arcdp

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 e5 6.Ndb5 d6 7.Bg5 a6 8.Na3 b5 9.Bxf6 gxf6 10.Nd5 f5 11.Bxb5 axb5 12.Nxb5 Ra4 13.b4 Rxb4 14.0-0 Rxb5 How should white continue?

TheGrobe

Arctor

If you have an ICC membership, Boris Alterman is doing a video series right now on b5 sacrifices in the Sveshnikov. Here's a free 5 minute preview of the 2nd part: http://webcast.chessclub.com/preview/Alterman/2011_09_01/Alterman_preview.html

arcdp

I am member of ICC I just want to know your opinions.

Benjamin145
thop_delapena wrote:

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 e5 6.Ndb5 d6 7.Bg5 a6 8.Na3 b5 9.Bxf6 gxf6 10.Nd5 f5 11.Bxb5 axb5 12.Nxb5 Ra4 13.b4 Rxb4 14.0-0 Rxb5 How should white continue?


 What if anything is wrong with  14.Nbc7+ Kd7 then 14Qh5 threating  check mate doesnt black lose Q here?

VLaurenT

14.0-0 looks like a mistake. Why not 14.Nbc7+ ?

Lucifer99

why not 14. Nxb4?

Benjamin145

not Nxb4 becuase 2minor pieces for a rook and a pawn is bad in the middle game.

Benjamin145
[COMMENT DELETED]
Lucifer99

so it's better to sac 2 minor peices rather than get a rook?

erikido23
hicetnunc wrote:

14.0-0 looks like a mistake. Why not 14.Nbc7+ ?


 I believe theory according alterman actually gives nd-b7+ as more accurate(don't remember why though)

Benjamin145

no point in losing 2 peices for nothing but 2 minor is better then a rook and pawn thats all if there is nothing to do then white can no longer conciter this as a line. but in a game if nothing else why not. just looking for the best possible outcome when studing but in a game may not have enough time then I would go for the rook and hope I could surf the waves.