Beginner? Don't use this opening - It's too theoretical! Better yet, don't learn any openings!

Sort:
sndeww

Just max out your luck stat 

Valleta-Chan
CRY0TIC_X wrote:
MeanFreePath2 wrote:
B1ZMARK wrote:
royalknight101 wrote:

 Learning is an incremental process, you learn a little theory, you play some games, and you update your theory. And if you're like me, who doesn't learn any mainline openings at all, by the time you actually get to the "2000+ range" (the most common threshold these people say) then it will actually be EXTREMELY HARD to learn theory!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Exactly and thats why its more of a waste for beginners and intermediates to not learn right away as it just gets them into more problems and baloney which they must deal with later

Yes! As someone who tried to learn mainline Catalan theory, it was near impossible to play it in 3min games because my opponents were playing the opening so fast I had to stop and gather my bearings each time.

and then there's me replying e5!? on move two everytime someone plays the london hoping they premove e3 and lose their bishop

bruh imagine falling for that and losing your bishop 

half of the people in the 1500 pool do

even if they don't they take like 3 seconds to go "wtf just happened"

JackRoach

I just play e6 hoping that I get a French.

JackRoach

who plays e5 against d4? Honestly.

Infinite_Blitz
JackRoach wrote:

who plays e5 against d4? Honestly.

people who hope for this

 

JackRoach

Yeah. Someone tried to trap me with this the other day.

 

JackRoach
Infinite_Blitz wrote:
JackRoach wrote:

who plays e5 against d4? Honestly.

people who hope for this

 

I know that trap too.

And people still think they can get me with this:

 

sndeww
JackRoach wrote:
Infinite_Blitz wrote:
JackRoach wrote:

who plays e5 against d4? Honestly.

people who hope for this

 

I know that trap too.

And people still think they can get me with this:

 

Funny thing, I learned the trap at 1900 level. I just never saw that the e5 pawn was hanging. 

JackRoach

Well, actually I saw it on the thumbnail of an Eric Rosen video.

JackRoach

And someone played it, and I'm like, this is a trap.

chamo2074

I fell for it once...

JackRoach
royalknight101 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:

And someone played it, and I'm like, this is a trap.

isnt this just the englund gambit

A trap in it.

JackRoach

There are two traps I know, maybe more.

Idk the names.

JackRoach

The one I showed with the knight sac? The one that ends in a checkmate? Or a different one completely?

JackRoach

Yes. I know that trap. I just posted a diagram of it.

JackRoach
JackRoach wrote:

Yeah. Someone tried to trap me with this the other day.

 

 

JackRoach

3. Nc3, 3.Nf3. Is there really a difference?

AunTheKnight
JackRoach wrote:

3. Nc3, 3.Nf3. Is there really a difference?

Doesn’t Nc3 protect the queen thus invalidating the trap?

JackRoach

Ah, true. 

I didn't know what move to do for move 3, so I just did a random developing move.

 

I see now. The trap doesn't work with Nc3.

AunTheKnight

Lol, refuting a gambit with a developing move. Ha! Bye Englund!