Against Reti I play d5.
Against English I play e6
Against the Queen's Gambit I play Nf6
Against e4 I play Sicilian Defence
Against Reti I play d5.
Against English I play e6
Against the Queen's Gambit I play Nf6
Against e4 I play Sicilian Defence
Then don't expect growth. Passing on to the study of another opening without finishing the first one is complete nonsense.
But tell me why? So that later there was confusion in the head and during the game the options were confused? And in general, few people have time to learn all the openings.
No bro its about more option and verstaility you have
Like I explained above how much verstaility with white pieces I have with 1 d4
No bro its about more option and verstaility you have
Like I explained above how much verstaility with white pieces I have with 1 d4
That's different. You have a d4 repertoire.
Yes
No bro its about more option and verstaility you have
Like I explained above how much verstaility with white pieces I have with 1 d4
What do you mean? Why? I don't understand you at all...
No bro its about more option and verstaility you have
Like I explained above how much verstaility with white pieces I have with 1 d4
What do you mean? Why? I don't understand you at all...
I was saying that you should learn 3 opening for flexibility I prepared the theory of queens gambit , catalan and Trompowsky and now I love playing d4 as I know what to do when opponent plays certain move or I can find out the inaccuries and weakness in the move which are not given in book
Flexibility in sense is just let's take a example against 1 d4 nf6 I can go for samisch variation if he plays g6 Or neo grunfeld if he goes g6 d5
Or I can play catalan Or if in mood can go for surprise with 2.BG5 Transposing to Trompowsky this is what flexibility means
I have no idea to play against the Queen's Gambit so against d4 I always play Nf6
As though the Indian-opening complex is easier.
No bro its about more option and verstaility you have
Like I explained above how much verstaility with white pieces I have with 1 d4
What do you mean? Why? I don't understand you at all...
I was saying that you should learn 3 opening for flexibility I prepared the theory of queens gambit , catalan and Trompowsky and now I love playing d4 as I know what to do when opponent plays certain move or I can find out the inaccuries and weakness in the move which are not given in book
Flexibility in sense is just let's take a example against 1 d4 nf6 I can go for samisch variation if he plays g6 Or neo grunfeld if he goes g6 d5
Or I can play catalan Or if in mood can go for surprise with 2.BG5 Transposing to Trompowsky this is what flexibility means
Ahh, it's all clear now.
But personally, when I played e4, and d4, and c4, there was no growth. And in the end, I still played only d4. Well, for a while I only played c4. Therefore, I do not understand why this is needed, and the meaning.
i do not think the scandinavian is a bad opening i just merely find it unambitious and uncreative. you rob white of what they would normally like to do which i suppose is something.
i am just an intermediate player but i have no trouble with the scandinavian. one thing every scandinavian player at my level loves to do is pin the knight after Nf3. this is annoying. while not the best move according to the engine playing h3 on move 4 disrupts this plan and still maintains advantage for white. it is often the case that the scandinavian player will go into an unusually long think after this move because Bg4 is what they always play and now your knight can move freely. i cannot remember the last time i lost to a scandinavian. mostly i lose to sicilians.