20533 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Does anyone play it?
It seems to have scored pretty well for white at higher levels... I already know a fair amount of Ruy Lopez theory, but my theory on the Petrov or Philidor isn't as strong... I suppose it's just a matter of preference, because objectively speaking the Ruy Lopez is popular because it's strong, but does anyone play or have an opinion on the Bishop's Opening?
I do. One of it's main qualities is the ability to transpose to the Italian, or KGD with an early f4.
I wish more would play it! Seems everyone is playing Roy Lopez.
The Bishop's Opening stands and falls with the the value of 3...c6. So you should look at this variation first.
Unfotunately for white 3...c6 is a good move, and more than that, it has been promoted by two recent theoretical books, by Kaufmann and Sakaev.
Kaufman suggests a modern interpretation of the variation (dropping in ...Bb4+ before putting the bishop on d6) while Sakaev does not approve the idea, and puts the bishop immediately on d6.
I never considered c6 to be that dangerous-
But I play Nc3 instead of d3.
The Paulsen defense is a defense to the bishop's opening.
Nf6 and c6, followed by d5 are the main ideas for black.
Here is a nice example for black:
Not exchanging in the center is best, according to Gary Lane
he gives Bb3 a lot of praise.
A book in this is Bishop's Opening Explained by Gary Lane.
Well, against the Bc4 Vienna, 3...Nc6 equalizes just a couple moves later. So it's not exactly a theoretical answer.
3.Nc3 Nxe4 and Black can't complain about a very comfortable game as early as move three.
He may even get ambitious if white goes for the complex Dracula variation, but IMO his best choice is to play it safe (4.Qh5 Nd6 5.Bb3 Be7) when he is at least equal.
Wow. This scares me. Is Bc4 refuted???
No, it's not "refuted".
It's just more harmless than a proper modern Italian.
The big idea is getting by transposition the king's gambit declined position you have posted on #6, which is very well analysed by Marin to complete equality in his book, and more than that, white cannot even force it...
I thought Nc3 was a huge problem if Black didn't play Bb4 first.
Sakaev thinks quite the opposite in his recent Petroff book, and he is one of the best theoreticians on planet earth.
Here Black tries to be tricky sometimes with a check 5...Bb4 +,aimed at preventing the development of White's knight on c3, orhe plays 5...a5, trying to make trouble for the enemy bishop.However, we shall analyze Black's most solid and, I believe, bestmove, 5...Bd6.
I know, English in the Chess Stars books are far from being good, but the analysis is almost always top notch.
I love it. "...English in the Chess Stars books are far from being good...". I love it. Really. And I love that you really know your stuff IMpfren.
Impfren, by Kaufman do you mean his book on his repertoire, on openings?
Yup. The line he suggests for Black is 1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Nf6 3.d3 c6 4.Nf3 d5 5.Bb3 Bb4+ (instead of the traditional 5...Bd6, suggested by Sakaev in his Petroff repertoire book).
To my poor knowledge, Sakaev's line is much more complex, but most probably safer. Kaufman's line has a "slight" problem, which he fails to address in his book, namely 6.Bd2! Bxd2+ 7.Qxd2, which is much less comfortable for Black than Kaufman thinks. I won't insert more details here (I have analysed this position a lot), but I do think white does have some advantage.
I hope you realize I wasn't being sarcastic when I wrote that I respect how you really know your stuff. And thank for that Kaufman reference and the lines. I'm going to check this stuff out. I need to learn this complex of openings, Bishops, Two Knights, Three knights, Italians, Spanish... I realize they're all different but I need to get some familirity with at least a few moves in with each of them.
5/27/2016 - Straight Checks
by olindorf a few minutes ago
Should i learn the bishop and knight vs king checkmate?
by halfgreek1963 a few minutes ago
TEAM MATCH AND VC LEADER BOARDS....
by DEATHW1SH a few minutes ago
To fold, or not to fold?
by verylate 3 minutes ago
Gambit in Alapin Sicilian (for White)?
by SilkyMcNuggets 5 minutes ago
I want to know the truth about Colorado gambit(aka Fred)
by lolurspammed 6 minutes ago
How many people think that; Chess is just a Total Waste of Time in Life!
by VeggieEater 6 minutes ago
Can women be as good at chess?
by jengaias 9 minutes ago
Martin0 vs Taulmaril minimatch
by CP6033 9 minutes ago
My Standard Rating just went Down!!
by Tina_e4c5 11 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!