What is accomplished by some individuals being mean when a non-existent policy is not followed?
What is accomplished when people ask the same questions, repeatedly, because they are too lazy to see if it has already been asked and answered before they post?
Some people get some sort of indication about the answer from those who don't like to toss out lazy judgments at those who don't follow non-existent policies?
... You ask a moronic question in the vein of the question every beginner asks and wonder why you get flack for it. ...
Does it really make sense to give someone "flack" (e. g. "... You're playing Black, fool! ...") for asking a question "in the vein of the question every beginner asks"?
Absolutely it makes sense. Whne ypu post a question that has been asled a billion times, and do not take the time to research it first? ...
Does it say somewhere that one is obliged to research a question before asking?
I will answer these in spongeyspeak...
Does it say somewhere that one is not obligated to research a question before asking?
So your idea is to be mean to those who don't conform to your notion of obligation?
Asking for an advantage as BLACK from move one is asking to refute an opening.
... You ask a moronic question in the vein of the question every beginner asks and wonder why you get flack for it. ...
Does it really make sense to give someone "flack" (e. g. "... You're playing Black, fool! ...") for asking a question "in the vein of the question every beginner asks"?
Absolutely it makes sense. Whne ypu post a question that has been asled a billion times, and do not take the time to research it first? ...
Does it say somewhere that one is obliged to research a question before asking?
I will answer these in spongeyspeak...
Does it say somewhere that one is not obligated to research a question before asking?
So your idea is to be mean to those who don't conform to your notion of obligation?
So your idea is to answer a question with a question?
Asking for an advantage as BLACK from move one is asking to refute an opening.
About 18 minutes ago, wasn't the phrase about playing for an advantage?
... You ask a moronic question in the vein of the question every beginner asks and wonder why you get flack for it. ...
Does it really make sense to give someone "flack" (e. g. "... You're playing Black, fool! ...") for asking a question "in the vein of the question every beginner asks"?
Absolutely it makes sense. Whne ypu post a question that has been asled a billion times, and do not take the time to research it first? ...
Does it say somewhere that one is obliged to research a question before asking?
I will answer these in spongeyspeak...
Does it say somewhere that one is not obligated to research a question before asking?
So your idea is to be mean to those who don't conform to your notion of obligation?
So your idea is to answer a question with a question?
What was done by FishEyedFools about 11 minutes ago?
... As mentioned previously, it is common courtesy to make an effort to look for an answer before asking a question. ...
Did someone give you the authority to decide what is expected here?
... On USENET (dating myself, I know), such a question would get slammed with "RTFM" or "RTMFM" responses. Given that the OP was given much more informational responses explaining why he was asking a silly question, I'd call it fairly polite in comparison.
Does it say somewhere that some USENET behavior defines what is expected here?
... You ask a moronic question in the vein of the question every beginner asks and wonder why you get flack for it. ...
Does it really make sense to give someone "flack" (e. g. "... You're playing Black, fool! ...") for asking a question "in the vein of the question every beginner asks"?
Absolutely it makes sense. Whne ypu post a question that has been asled a billion times, and do not take the time to research it first? ...
Does it say somewhere that one is obliged to research a question before asking?
I will answer these in spongeyspeak...
Does it say somewhere that one is not obligated to research a question before asking?
So your idea is to be mean to those who don't conform to your notion of obligation?
So your idea is to answer a question with a question?
What was done by FishEyedFools about 11 minutes ago?
Is it written somewhere that past events are to be repeated for future gain?
Did someone give you the authority to decide what is expected here?
Did someone give you such authority? ...
Am I calling people fools, unworthy, etc. in order to promote my notion of obligation?
Does it say somewhere that some USENET behavior defines what is expected here?
... So, to follow your typical passive-aggressive pattern: Does it say somewhere that Chess.com will ignore social norms of forum courtesy that has been established for the last 25 years?
Does it say somewhere that you decide what social norms of forum courtesy are established for the last 25 years?
... You ask a moronic question in the vein of the question every beginner asks and wonder why you get flack for it. ...
Does it really make sense to give someone "flack" (e. g. "... You're playing Black, fool! ...") for asking a question "in the vein of the question every beginner asks"?
Absolutely it makes sense. Whne ypu post a question that has been asled a billion times, and do not take the time to research it first? ...
Does it say somewhere that one is obliged to research a question before asking?
... Is it written somewhere that past events are to be repeated for future gain?
Is repetition likely when there are new beginners all the time? Do some people seem to have no problem with this?
Does it say somewhere that you decide what social norms of forum courtesy are established for the last 25 years?
Have you been living under a rock for the last 3 decades? Here, I'll make it easy for you:
Do you have a quote of it saying somewhere that this determines what goes on here at chess.com?
Am I calling people fools, unworthy, etc. in order to promote my notion of obligation?
Prior to the OP's lame attempt to be rude and hide it behind a different language, did I?
Do you defend others calling people fools, unworthy, etc.?
... You ask a moronic question in the vein of the question every beginner asks and wonder why you get flack for it. ...
Does it really make sense to give someone "flack" (e. g. "... You're playing Black, fool! ...") for asking a question "in the vein of the question every beginner asks"?
Absolutely it makes sense. Whne ypu post a question that has been asled a billion times, and do not take the time to research it first? ...
Does it say somewhere that one is obliged to research a question before asking?
... Is it written somewhere that past events are to be repeated for future gain?
Is repetition likely when there are new beginners all the time? Do some people seem to have no problem with this?
Is repetition necessary when the answers are already available?
... You ask a moronic question in the vein of the question every beginner asks and wonder why you get flack for it. ...
Does it really make sense to give someone "flack" (e. g. "... You're playing Black, fool! ...") for asking a question "in the vein of the question every beginner asks"?
Absolutely it makes sense. Whne ypu post a question that has been asled a billion times, and do not take the time to research it first? ...
Does it say somewhere that one is obliged to research a question before asking?
... Is it written somewhere that past events are to be repeated for future gain?
Is repetition likely when there are new beginners all the time? Do some people seem to have no problem with this?
Is repetition necessary when the answers are already available?
Who decided that repetition is only acceptable when meeting your notion of necessity?
Do you have a quote of it saying somewhere that this determines what goes on here at chess.com?
Do you have a hard time understanding what "social norms" are?
My problem is with the notion of one authority deciding the nature of the social norms. Was there ever an election of such an authority?
Do you defend others calling people fools, unworthy, etc.?
Did I say anywhere that it was okay? ...
This is part of what I saw about 12 hours ago: "... You ask a moronic question in the vein of the question every beginner asks and wonder why you get flack for it. ..."
... You ask a moronic question in the vein of the question every beginner asks and wonder why you get flack for it. ...
Does it really make sense to give someone "flack" (e. g. "... You're playing Black, fool! ...") for asking a question "in the vein of the question every beginner asks"?
Absolutely it makes sense. Whne ypu post a question that has been asled a billion times, and do not take the time to research it first? ...
Does it say somewhere that one is obliged to research a question before asking?
I will answer these in spongeyspeak...
Does it say somewhere that one is not obligated to research a question before asking?