Bringing out queen early

No need to drop pawns, just make developing moves that also protect your pawns. After that you can start thinking about making developing moves that attack the Queen, because that wins you time.

I like the Sicilian for black; it has a reputation for being the 'expert' opening, but I find it easier to control the center and boss around enemy queens with ...c5

For the guy who MUST attack f7, these lines work:

Although the example of the OP is extreme, I too hate it when players bring their Queen out early. It seems to cause a short-circuit in my brain.

"Bringing your Queen out early is not good, so my opponent must be a bad chess player, therefore I should win easily. Not only that, but I should crush him in a way that he resigns in tears, promising himself never to bring his Queen out early ever again" - that is sort of my thought process. You can see why this is not very helpful.

The problem is that while bringing your Queen out early is not very good, neither does it lose by force. The other side still has to play very carefully in order to obtain and retain an advantage. So when my opponent plays 2. Qf3 or something similar, I need all my mental energy to clear away the red fog from my brain and have none over to just find normal, solid opening moves. As I said, I hate it.

Having said that, somebody did play 4.Qf3 in a daily game the other day, and I seem to have calmed down in time to punish him for it. The game is still ongoing (waiting for move 8 as I write this), so you can all check if I have succeeded:

https://www.chess.com/daily/game/210943962

Indeed, but as this game is still ongoing, please don't post analysis like this yet. Either me or my opponent might get ideas...

I'm sorry, what part of "The game is still ongoing (waiting for move 8 as I write this)" did you not understand?

Please don't call people names when the mistake is yours.

Well, he shouldn't have insulted you but you should never post ongoing games either, for rather obvious reasons.

Really, there are two answers:

(1) Watch your pawns! No amount of preparation is going to substitute for plain old awareness. Some players INSIST on moving the queen and trying to take the pawn on f7/f2 with checkmate. And - when they can't - they'll settle for grabbing pawns. What you have to remember here is that you want to kick their queen WITHOUT losing anything important. If you manage to do that, you will have a lead in development, and their queen often ends up on a silly square.....if you don't, they take everything and call you names in the chat.

(2) Make CONSCIOUS opening choices. This is not an invitation to go theory mad and memorize some grandmaster line 25 moves deep; it's an invitation to begin thinking about your chess game BEFORE you get in trouble. 

There are a lot of well known traps in 1.e4 e5. Entire books are dedicated to them, and a lot of people have spent a lot of time memorizing these cheap tricks. So - when you play ...e5 in response to e4 - you're going down one of the most theory-heavy paths in all of chess, and you should spend some time learning those traps from the white side so you know how to counteract them with black

On the other hand, you could pick a different defense which will - undoubtedly - have its own unique set of cheapos, but your opponents are 10x less likely to have studied them. The Scandinavian, Caro Kan, French defense, and Sicilian are all good choices and not so hard to learn as the internet would have you believe. Personally, I've never played ...e5 as a main weapon simply because I would rather play a position I know and my opponent doesn't than the other way 'round. 

Also, when you lose to a trick, put it in an engine. I got a chess GUI with stockfish built in for free; there's no excuse for a 21st century chess player not to have an engine and use it to death.