Budapest Gambit problem

Sort:
Avatar of chessmaster102
pfren wrote:
 

 thanks for the game refrence but white wasted a move more than nesscary with Qe4+ and kept it there making it a little misplaced so this doen't fit the bill for refuting 4.Qd4  but post #19 seems like a better take a look.


Ah, yes, you are right! That brilliant Qd1-d4-d1 trick refutes the Budapest...

OK, try to improve White's play on the following:

 

 

Easy to find an improvement- no?

Did you apply my tip #1, or not?


 Now thats a better game refrence the first one seemed flawed but now my question is finally answered.Smile

Avatar of chessmaster102
pfren wrote:
 

 thanks for the game refrence but white wasted a move more than nesscary with Qe4+ and kept it there making it a little misplaced so this doen't fit the bill for refuting 4.Qd4  but post #19 seems like a better take a look.


Ah, yes, you are right! That brilliant Qd1-d4-d1 trick refutes the Budapest...

OK, try to improve White's play on the following:

 

 

Easy to find an improvement- no?

Did you apply my tip #1, or not?


 Curious waht are the ratings of those to players.

Avatar of pfren
chessmaster102 wrote:
pfren wrote:
 

 thanks for the game refrence but white wasted a move more than nesscary with Qe4+ and kept it there making it a little misplaced so this doen't fit the bill for refuting 4.Qd4  but post #19 seems like a better take a look.


Ah, yes, you are right! That brilliant Qd1-d4-d1 trick refutes the Budapest...

OK, try to improve White's play on the following:

 

 

Easy to find an improvement- no?

Did you apply my tip #1, or not?


 Curious waht are the ratings of those to players.


They are four players, actually, two games merged. Why do you bother about their rating? Ask Houdini how he estimates White's position after Black's eight. I can assure you it will not be pleased at all.