Building my Solid Opening Repertoire (Fischer's)

Sort:
Avatar of Master_Po

 

Well said, @Yureesystem .  Carlsen not so great, not near the fighting spirit of THE MAN.  If he plays Karjakin again it may be different.  Carlsen was playing to not lose, not to win.  The MAN always played to win, taking risks, taking opponent into the dark forest.    Karjakin may be better player but at least as good.   Does anyone think that Carlsen will be champion for 20 years like Kasparov?  Nothing against the young man, but he's overrated.  Bobby would be rated 3000 today if he had access to Houdini or the like.  I could beat Carlsen in ping pong. . . so could Bobby.  

Avatar of IMBacon22
StupidGM wrote:

I won't be posting indefinitely, as I'm drafting a lawsuit (and a number of police complaints) relating to a certain hate website which some people cannot distinguish as spite fiction.  Two posts from this thread will be mentioned in the lawsuit, as it will be noted that the wetebsite was set up to bait my enemies into repeating its contents so that I would sue the "pawns" who are being used.

 

The question is: who would benefit the most from this?  In the suit I'll be noting that I could easily have sued instead the many people who grabbed the "poisoned pawn" but then I'd be playing into the hands of the instigators, who sit back laughing at how normally decent people are being set up.

 

As a general advisory, if you go searching someone's name on the internet, and you find a "gang" of people plotting against someone, you may have just joined the gang without realizing it.  Technically this is the fault of those who grab the bait, as they should know better, but they certainly had help in being manipulated.

 

The reason I have to sue is that as I return to OTB chess, if this were to happen in a skittles room or at a tournament, people would be locked up, sued, or much worse.  As it is, anyone who plays at a chess tournament who I can sue can easily be served at the tournament, and be sued in any state in which they play, including my home state of Pennsylvania, should they be at the World Open later this month.

 

Anyone who starts shit with me there better have an army behind them.

 

Raymond, everytime you open another account here youre threatening to sue someone.

Avatar of yureesystem
Master_Po wrote:

 

Well said, @Yureesystem .  Carlsen not so great, not near the fighting spirit of THE MAN.  If he plays Karjakin again it may be different.  Carlsen was playing to not lose, not to win.  The MAN always played to win, taking risks, taking opponent into the dark forest.    Karjakin may be better player but at least as good.   Does anyone think that Carlsen will be champion for 20 years like Kasparov?  Nothing against the young man, but he's overrated.  Bobby would be rated 3000 today if he had access to Houdini or the like.  I could beat Carlsen in ping pong. . . so could Bobby.  

 Master_Po, you are  correct Bobby would be rated 3000 and maybe higher, possibly beat stockfish. happy.png

Avatar of chesster3145

Besides, @StupidGM can't sue anybody. He calls Magnus a moron, I call him a moron. That's called freedom of speech, and it doesn't have to be pretty. The pathetic "bullying" narrative isn't valid either, since there is no power difference between him and some other person on the Internet and he deserves every bit of shit he gets for serially disrespecting players of all ratings by claiming he can play better than them.

Avatar of SonOfThunder2
intermediatedinoz wrote:
SonOfThunder2 wrote:
intermediatedinoz wrote:
SonOfThunder2 wrote:

Look up Zaphys blog on openings

Fischer's actually. 1.d3 is not bad either.

lol

What are you laughing for? He played some very awkward openings from time to time.

 

take a look

 

Just insert Robert J Fischer.

But he had the brains to win with them

Avatar of yureesystem

Fischer is awesome, he can take a harmless opening and make it into a deadly weapon; that is a true world champion, I look above game share by intermediatedinoz; Fischer vs. Larsen opening Caro Kann defense, Two Knights variation.

Avatar of NarrowLlama123

why so rude pfren, I'm not a strong chess player but I know a thing or 2 about manners

Avatar of najdorf96

indeed. phren can take luxury in the fact he is an Icon on chess.com. Whatever, I never much liked the guy but I respect him. But ultimately though, if you're in such a position where you're asking for informal advice, information then you get what you're asking for~subtle condescending replies that are over your head, that sound "right" but never really answers your question because you're not willing to do the due diligence yourself AND then asking for recommendations. Instead, you depend on such people and follow blindly into their realm. Whether their stuff is right or wrong you wouldn't know it & couldn't argue against it... you just have to take it (rudely or not).

Avatar of najdorf96

I'm a big RJF fanboy and have played over once or twice many of his games as reference (as I play the Naj & KID as my mainstays on Defense) but i don't play 1. e4 anymore. It's totally useful to play over his games as white to see how his philosophy offensively works out though. He broke ground with a lot of lines, variations, subtle innovations or use of play in openings based on clear, disciplined, logical moves with keen razor sharp focus on which paths to follow and sticking to it. Learning his opening play is easy, learning his philosophy depends on learning your own. Best wishes ✌🏽