Control the center

Not sure if this is a joke but that is a weird version of Kings Gambit Accepted. What happens when your opponent plays Qh4+?

my point is, it controls the center.(isnt that the main point of the start of a game-iforget what its called-?

It controls the center, but at the cost of a pawn and a queen check making the king move!

I have 8 pawns.

Not worth it. Not only is white down a pawn now, but after Qh4+ things are going to get VERY dangerous for white.

It isnt wise to take out your queen in the start.

Usually that's the case, but if taking out the queen will guarantee you an advantage, you should by all means bring it out. This is one of the cases in which bringing out the queen is a very good thing to do. As soon as black plays Qh4+ there are many things black can do to completerly shatter the game for white.

My point is, i won most of my games lilke that, so that was something i like to share.

 You are a low rated player. I'm not trying to insult you, but I'm saying that you probably win most of your games like that because since you face other low rated players, they don't know how to exploit your open kingside properly. This causes you to beat them because you have the better position if you don't take into account the open kingside. In conclusion, you will only win games like this against weak players. Other than that, this is a bad opening.

All you have to do is play 3 Nf3 instead, then you can try to have most of the central control you had without getting checked.

 This is actually a variation of King's Gambit that I tried to play at first. As the other people have said Qh4+ causes a lot of problems for white. I don't like or play the King's Gambit because of reasons explained in the diagrams below. I prefer the Queen's Gambit.

turkey: If black plays c5, white plays d3. If after that, black doesn't bother trying to keep the pawn, white takes it with the bishop and has a nice position.

I do agree that Queen's Gambit is better. In Queen's Gambit, it's harder for black to hold on to his pawn and the kingside isn't left wide open.

If Black played c5, I'd play Bc4, clamping down on the gaping hole on d5, and I wouldn't even care if black hangs onto that extra pawn on f4. There are too many attacking chances for white after c5 (after O-O and Nc3), since the d5 push is now pretty much impossible. If Black tries to hang onto the pawn with g5, I would highly consider a Nxg5 followed by Bxf4 sac (after the necessary developing moves of course).

Yes, i agree. Another STUBORN, NOOBCAKE trying to impress us

 your point is....

Jeez, no wonder more inexperienced players don't try and share stuff..

Yeah, this is a site where everybody can share.  Misguided as some people are, they are entitled to their own opinion.

They shouldn't be sharing things if they are wrong about them and won't admit it. They should probably ask things so they can learn.

I don't see why when some people come along saying he's wrong he should immediately admit it without raising a few questions. Saying that bringing one's Queen out is always bad and that something is good just because he usually wins with it are quite plausible reasons and are the sort of thing I hear a lot from young players. His questions were answered and I'm sure he's taken them on board. Trying to belittle him was certainly unnecessary.