Defences to the Parham Attack

Sort:
pfren

Actually, he doesn't want to be a troll. He IS a troll- by definition.

Scottrf
whatupyodog4 wrote:

Guess whos back!!!

Shady?

The_Gavinator
ChristianSoldier007 wrote:

sure hope its not cheater_1

Shepi?

The_Gavinator
Scottrf wrote:
whatupyodog4 wrote:

Guess whos back!!!

Shady?

Shady hasn't been back since "The Eminem Show"

The_Gavinator

Yeah that's eminem. Eminem sucks. Slim shady kicks ass.

shepi13
The_Gavinator wrote:
ChristianSoldier007 wrote:

sure hope its not cheater_1

Shepi?


You are going to leave me alone you idiot.

The_Gavinator

So much for you stopped tracking...

The_Gavinator

Well you haven't posted a refuation so...

The_Gavinator

Well see that's not a Parham Attack, so I'm not sure how that relates to this.

The_Gavinator

The Parham Attack is: 1. e4 e5 2. Qh5. 1. e4 c5 is not a Parham.

e4nf3

Well, my theory is that a really good chess player is going to win against a bad chess player...regardless of the opening chosen.

The really good chess player can even have one eye blindfolded and one hand tied behind his back...while doing the Parham, bong cloud or whatever...and will still win.

The_Gavinator

Ok. Then the Ruy Lopez, the Scotch, the Italian, the Queen's Gambit, The 4 Knight's, and just about every other opening is refuted.

shepi13

Gavinator, your only proof that I cheated is that my live rating is lower than my online. Check my blitz rating now, you'll see that when I am not trying out new openings like the hippo I score very well. My online - my blitz is now only about 130. AND THAT WAS YOUR ONLY PROOF.

 

I will quote whatupyodog now, when I asked him if he thought I was cheating:

"i believe using a database is cheating."

 

He doesn't think I'm using an engine, but believes databases are cheap. Now if I quote the fair play policy:

"In turn-based chess, you may consult books or databases (including the Chess.com Explorer) for opening moves."

 

Even your closest pal whatupyodog doesn't think I'm using an engine, the only cheating he thinks I'm doing is allowed in correspondance chess. So without any proof not a single sane (or insane) person will believe any of your accusations.

The_Gavinator

Then what opening do you play Russian?

Apoapsis

I've taken up the Sicilian to avoid this mess.

The_Gavinator

I agree, the Parham is a reason that e5 is implayable. The English is ok, it often transposes to a queen's pawn opening.

The_Gavinator

Idk, I agree the sicilian is a tough beast, it's my own #1 agasint e4. But for some reason, kids keep playing e5. I actually have been looking to get into a non-e4 opening, because of the sicilian. The Parham is just so freaking good that I can't get away...

Fiercesome142

Dear The_Gavinator,

 I believe this opening is beat by simply gambiting off the pawn to gain tremenous tempo on the queen as follows;

As I said, keep the openings cominhg, I just don't think this opening has potential to be a good opening. I'd really like to see any other ideas you have for openings though. Good luck.

Sincerely,

Fiercesome142

atarw

Why do u need a defense? I can beat anyone who uses Parham against me!

Well, except for:

-Computersa

-IMs

-GMs

-NMs

-Masters

-Experts

-Class A

-You know what, I can beat anyone who uses the Parham who doesn't cheat, and is rated below 0.

SO there!

Dark_Falcon
whatupyodog4 wrote:

Here is yet another game proving the parham pwns.

 

Did you ever show a glorious Parham-victory, where your opponent was not a minimum of 200 points ranked below you?

I can show you several of my greatest victories with the infamous Soller-Gambit against guys with a rating of 1200 - 1400...that doesnt proof that the Soller-Gambit is by far the soundest Gambit on Earth!

What about a website especially for you, your freaky friend Gavinator and the Parham?

You could play thousands of games, discuss the newest lines and how the Parham can save the Peace on Earth and the Rainforest?

Think about it...