Defences to the Parham Attack

would you call a 1550 dumb

Ok, I'm adapting a new policy. I'm just ignoring anything jetfighter says. Anyways, if you'd like to get back to the OP, we still haven't found a line where black isn't getting crushed. The OP has the closest line yet, but it is still not very good for black.

you forgot to add h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 Bg4 Qe3 Black with an easy game like joey has said and the game whatup v shepi proves (until shepi blundered darn overconfidence.)

that is probably what happened. however I think all his moves were logical when I looked at the game. (it opened with 4 pawns attack(I lost the PGN so I can't post it right now))

Why couldn't one cheat with an old free version of Rybka?  2800 isn't strong enough?  Not saying you do or did, but that isn't much of a reason.

An old version of Rybka, or the newest of Houdini is not strong enough if there are pebkac issues which prevent it giving a correct output.

I'm not sure what pebkac issues are, but the old versions of Rybka, issues or not, destroyed the top GM's of the day in exhibitions with regularity.  I think they'd probably be sufficient to handle a blunder-prone Parham player.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_error

Great avatar, @VectorVictor.  Clearly puts your opponent on his back foot. Intimidating.

But @Joey still leads the pack, with teeth only a dentist could love.

Black is lost since ages, white can win anyway he likes.

Factly, Black just resigned.

Now i finally know the reason for your low rating...and i thought, you were such a bad player. So you are a master which hides his real strength because you would get in trouble, if you would show your real strength.

Your real strength combined with your Parham-Religion would end in a lifetime-ban from chess.com.

In which analysis did you ever showed, that the Parham gives you a great position.

My opinion is, that the Parham is not worse, but by far not the strongest opening in the universe as you are always and always stating in 50 different threads.

Maybe if you would qualify your statements and try to be more objective, people would pay more respect to you. And maybe we could end this senseless discussion soon.

Use your brain and think about it.

That's what happened to whatupyodog.

And look at the OP of this thread, white has obviously better position and development.

Sorry, but why would Chess.com ban a higher rated player because of Parham-Spamming and not a lower rated...i dont see the context?!? Please explain this to me, it makes no sense for me...

I don't know how old you are, but in a government, or history class, or something like that, you will learn about Facism. That is similar to communism, but everybody must "worship" their leader. So chess.com makes it so that everybody must only play mainline opneings, and if they try to have different ideas, they will stop you. They have already closed two threads about the Parham, and banned a 1900 who plays it. As long as I stay low rated, they probably won't notice me, and I should be safe from ban.

you keep using the word "fascism" but I don't even know what you are referring to. Of course I've heard of it, and heard it used and abused; some people say the U.S is "fascist"; or that the police are "fascist pigs;" or that George W Bush or the military or talk show hosts or the French govt etc etc etc or whatever are "fascist." But they never define fascist. It is one of the most used and little - understood accusations in the world. My dictionary defines it as "a philosophy or system of govt that is marked by stringent social and economic control, a strong centralized govt usually headed by a dictator, and often a policy of belligerent nationalism." I was just wondering how this applies to your use of the word as you have used in in your posts. I don't think it applies here. 

Here is the best play for the Parham:

Sorry Mate, but thats completely nonsens...i only play sideline openings, dubious gambits and other stuff, my rating is above 1900 and you see iam still here...no one will be ever be banned for playing bad openings...

The difference between you and me is, that i dont try to convince anyone, that the Englund Gambit is the Holy Grail, thats what you are trying to do the whole day with your Parham-stuff. Its annoying!!!

Talking to much bull.... and spamming threads with ideas nobody wants to know can also lead to a ban.

They closed two important Parham-Threads? OK...48 Parham-Thread are still open.

So if Chess.com is such an evil monster, why are you still there?

There are many other options for a guy like you.

But i dont want to destroy your conspiracy theories.

By the way...look at my profile, there you can see my age...

everybody must play mainline openings?? what are you talking about?? you can play any opening you want. they will not "stop you." but your rating may remain low if you don't play good openings; oops, I forgot, your rating is low because you keep it that way on purpose