Defences to the Parham Attack

just ignore them and they go away. 

What's wrong with the Parham? I guess it's been pretty much proven that it's unbeatable:

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/parham-conspriacy-theory

I have come to the conclusion that parham supporters are just ego maniacs that want attention. They create threads to gain attention for themselves and probably go to bed at night laughing at the whole situation and all the attention and time they have gotten people to waste. 

OR 

they are idiots who want  are so desprate to believe they are right that they refuse to acknowledge anything that disproves their system of believe regardless of the evidence provided. 

In either case they are an utter waste of time to deal with.

CS, what are you talking about?

he doesnt care about proof, CS you can show him all the proof in the world but he will stick to the moronic attidute just to keep you involved and distracted. Igtnore him! if the morons make a comment pretend it didnt happen. if they say something they dont exist. 

I think they want banned so they can cry foul...

I am actually helping young chess players. And I apologize CS, I thought that was a joke...

Ok, we already showed your 6...d5 doesn't work.

Helping them do what? Learn how to waste their time on stupid opening moves

Bernard Parham learned chess from watching people playing in the park. He noticed whoever brought out the queen earlier won, and developed the Matrix System on this.

And CS, in your board, as Sungolian said, Bg5 and white is still doing great as usual.

and it is a joke. any serious player knows that this is a tempo trap waiting to happen. thats why I play the bishop's Gambit. If I had a nickle for every time a person played 3. ... Qh4+ against me I would be a milionaire. I have like a 100% win rate otb with it. so it must be bad.

Is that why you've lost to whatupyodog about 5 times in that line? The KG just throws away material, with no tempo. The Parham uses a tempo forcing black to make an inferor move (g6), and is actually strong. The KG doesn't do anything for you in reality.

If this is so great as you claim then why is it not seen in many games between GM's? Because anyone that is trying to get better at chess does not waste their time with this kind of stuff. I'm sorry but i will stick to the stuff GM's play

No it's because GM's overlook it for moving the queen out early. If it is so bad, why is white better in every single line? That's all of the proof you need, nothing else.

Gavinator if the KG gives me nothing then why did I win the following game. my annotations included.

I left the annotations I sent to my opponent

then h6 Bh4 g5 Bg3 Bg4 Qe3 and white only had the illusion of an attack, and Black hasn't castled so won't go behind a weakened structure if he doesn't need to.

I though Black haddent castled. well I must be blind or my glasses need cleaning. then after Qe3 Kh7 preparing h5 and Bh6 placing the bishop on a better diagonal

your missing the point Sungolian White should have an advantage after the opening. Period! if black can  equalize with easy play then the opening is refuted as there are better openings to play that cause black more problems and are more challenging to play the correct moves. 
Gravinatior claims constantly that its an instant win . white is better, white is winning. white has a winning attack blah blah blah. The fact is that black can easily equalize in a few moves before the opening is even over (defined by castling /completing development) the opening does not challenge black enough to create serious problems. The rest of the game is just based on ability.

Gravinator makes idiotic statments that say every opening equalizes and this is just simply false and shows he is just trolling for attention. many openings are not equal and black has to play very accurately to gain a draw. NOT equality but a draw. Equality is defined as equal chances to WIN!. 
players look to play for 2 results win or draw. You will often hear players saying that all three results can occur as a way of saying that something has gone wrong for white. 

to refute an opening means that chances have been reduced to white having equal chances to lose as black when he should be only playing for 2 results. 

I said that white has an advantage . black being able to draw is NOT the same as an equal position. Think of a pawn up endgame . black can draw but the position is NOT equal only white can win. Do not confuse equal chances with a game being a draw. as long as your pulling out quotes
Tal once said that in many positions when Black is considered equal he is actually better. The reason for this is that white often plays like they have better chances and end up over playing their position and end up degraing thier position from equal to slightly better for black to wining for black. A good way to look at computer evaluations is to look at the trend of the assessment is it trending = or decreasing or improving.